Composition, quality characteristics and microstructure of the grain Triticum dicoccum
Keywords:wheat, grain, composition, microstructure, antioxidant activity, technological properties
The compositional and quality characteristics of two wheat varieties Triticum dicoccum (Triticum dicoccum var. dicoccum, Triticum dicoccum var. rufum) produced in the Republic of Azerbaijan have been tested and are relatively useful in assessing their applicability to bread production. The wheat species studied, Triticum dicoccum, were found to have a higher protein and cell content, as well as essential proteins of lysine, phenylalanine, leucine and isoleucine, methionine and valine, relative to Gorbustan wheat varieties. The chromatographic method was used to determine the carbohydrate composition of the Triticum dicoccum grain. The following redistribution of low molecular weight carbohydrate fractions is noted: the maltose content is higher, and galactose, glucose and fructose are much lower than those of the modern wheat variety Gorbustan. Such a distribution of carbohydrates can reduce the formation of toxic products when baking bread. In addition, the wheat grain Triticum dicoccum is characterized by a higher content of sterols, in particular β-sitosterol. The antioxidant activity expressed as percentage inhibition of DPPG free radicals in the Triticum dicoccum grain is twice as high as this indicator for wheat of the commercial variety Gorbustan. By scanning electron microscopy, it has been established that the microstructure of the grain surface and the cross section has varietal characteristics. Grain Triticum dicoccum var. rufum has a thicker shell, tighter and tighter, unlike the grain of Triticum dicoccum var. dicoccum. With all the benefits of the wheat grain Triticum dicoccum, its technological properties were even worse. But the use of technological methods to boost gluten will ensure the production of high-quality healthy bread from old wheat grain.
Abdel-Aal, E.-S. M., Hucl, P. 2002. Amino acid composition and in vitro protein digestibility of selected ancient wheats and their end products. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, vol. 15, no. 6, p. 737-747. https://doi.org/10.1006/jfca.2002.1094 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jfca.2002.1094
Buddrick, O., Jones, O. A. N., Cornell, H. J., Small, D. M. 2014. The influence offermentation processes and cereal grains in wholegrain bread on reducing phytate content. Journal of Cereal Science, vol. 59, no. 1, p. 3-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2013.11.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2013.11.006
Buvaneshwari, G., Yenagi, N. B., Hanchinal, R. R., Naik, R. K. 2003. Glycaemic responses to dicoccum products in the dietary management of diabetes. The Indian Journal of Nutrition and Dietetics, vol. 40, no. 10, p. 363-368.
Calzuola, I., Perni, S., Caprara, G. A. M., Gianfranceschi, G. L., Marsili, V. 2013. A comparative study of the antioxidant activity of rice, wheat and spelt. Progress in Nutrition, vol. 15, no. 3, p. 194-205.
Cubadda, R., Marconi, E. 1996. Technological and nutritional aspects in emmer and spelt. In: Padulosi S, Hammer K, Heller J. Hulled wheats, promoting the conservation and used of underutilized and neglected crops. Proceedings of the first international workshop on hulled Wheats. Rome, Italy : IPGRI, p. 203-211.
Čurná, V., Lacko-Bartošová, M. 2017. Chemical composition and nutritional value of emmer wheat (Triticum dicoccon schrank): A review. Journal of Central European Agriculture, vol. 18, no. 1, p. 117-134. https://doi.org/10.5513/JCEA01/18.1.1871 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5513/JCEA01/18.1.1871
Dhanavath, S., Prasada Rao, U. J. S. 2017. Nutritional and Nutraceutical Properties of Triticum dicoccum Wheat and Its Health Benefits: An Overview. Journal of Food Science, vol. 82, no. 10, p. 2243-2250. https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.13844 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.13844
Geisslitz, S., Wieser, H., Scherf, K. A., Koehler, P. 2018. Gluten protein composition and aggregation properties as predictors for bread volume of common wheat, spelt, durum wheat, emmer and einkorn. Journal of Cereal Science, vol. 83, p. 204-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2018.08.012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2018.08.012
Giambanelli, A., E. Ferioli, F., Koçaoglu, B., Jorjadze, M., Alexieva, I., Darbinyan, N., D'Antuono, L. F. 2013. A comparative study of bioactive compounds in primitive wheat populations from Italy, Turkey, Georgia, Bulgaria and Armenia. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, vol. 93, no. 14, p. 3490-3501. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.6326 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.6326
Grela, E. R. 1996. Nutrient composition and content of antinutritional factors in spelt (Triticum spelta L) cultivars. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, vol. 71, no. 3, p. 399-404. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0010(199607)71:3<399::AID-JSFA609>3.3.CO;2-H DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0010(199607)71:3<399::AID-JSFA609>3.0.CO;2-Q
Hailu, F., Merker, A. 2008. Variation in gluten strength and yellow pigment in Ethiopian tetraploid wheat germplasm. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, vol. 55, no. 2, p. 277-285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-007-9233-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-007-9233-6
Hanchinal, R. R., Yenagi, N. B., Bhuvaneswari, G., Math, K. K. 2005. Grain quality and value addition of emmer wheat. University of Agricultural Sciences Dharwad, p. 63.
Hejtmánková, K., Lachman, J., Hejtmánková, A., Pivec, V., Janovská, D. 2010. Tocols of selected spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), einkorn wheat (Triticum monococcum L.) and wild emmer (Triticum dicoccum Schuebl [Schrank]) varieties. Food Chemistry, vol. 123, no. 4, p. 1267-1274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.05.064 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.05.064
Chatenoud, L., Tavani, A., La Vecchia, C., Jacobs, Jr. D. R., Negri, E., Levi, F., Franceschi, S. 1998. Whole grain food intake and cancer risk. International Journal of Cancer, vol. 77, no. 1, p. 24-28. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19980703)77:1<24::AID-IJC5>3.3.CO;2-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19980703)77:1<24::AID-IJC5>3.0.CO;2-1
Iafelice, G., Verardo, V., Marconi, E., Caboni, M. F. 2009. Characterization of total, free and esterified phytosterols in tetraploid and hexaploid wheats. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 57, no. 6, p. 2267-2273. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf803356a DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/jf803356a
Ivanišová, E., Ondrejovič, M., Dráb, Š., Tokár, M. 2011. The evaluation of antioxidant activity of milling fractions of selected cereals grown in the year. Potravinarstvo, vol. 5, no. 4, p. 28-33. https://doi.org/10.5219/163 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5219/163
Kissing, L., Dyckb, K. E., Russellc, J., Clarkd, L., Hamelmane, J., Burns-Leaderf, S., Sendersg, S., Jonesh, J., Benschera, D., Davisa, M., Rothi, G., Zwingerj, S., Sorrellsa, M. E., Dawsonk, J. C. 2017. Evaluation of wheat and emmer varieties for artisanal baking, pasta making, and sensory quality. Journal of Cereal Science, vol. 74, p. 19-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2016.12.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2016.12.010
Konvalina, P., Capouchová, I., Stehno, Z., Moudrý, Jr., J., Moudrý, J. 2011. Composition of essential amino acids in emmer wheat landraces and old and modern varieties of bread wheat. Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment, vol. 9, no. 3-4, p. 193-197.
Lachman, J., Orsák, M., Pivec, V., Jírů, K. 2012. Antioxidant activity of grain of einkorn (Triticum mono-coccum l.), emmer (Triticum dicoccum schuebl [schrank]) and spring wheat (Triticum aestivum l.) varieties. Plant, Soil and Environment, vol. 58, no. 1, p. 15-21. https://doi.org/10.17221/300/2011-PSE DOI: https://doi.org/10.17221/300/2011-PSE
Larsson, S. C., Giovannucci, E., Bergkvist, L., Wolk, A. 2005.Whole grain consumption and risk of colorectal cancer: A population-based cohort of 60 000 women. British Journal of Cancer, vol. 92, no. 9, p. 1803-1807. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6602543 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6602543
Longin, C. F. H., Ziegler, J., Schweiggert, R., Carle, R., Würschum, T. 2016. Comparative study of hulled (einkorn, emmer, and spelt) and naked wheats (durum and bread wheat): Agronomic performance and quality traits. Crop Science, vol. 56, no. 1, p. 302-311. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2015.04.0242 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2015.04.0242
Mohan, B. H., Malleshi, N. G. 2006. Characteristics of native and enzymatically hydrolyzed common wheat (Triticum aestivum) and dicoccum wheat (Triticum dicoccum) starches. European Food Research and Technology, vol. 223, no. 3, p. 355-361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-005-0212-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-005-0212-x
Montonen, J., Knekt, P., Järvinen, R., Aromaa, A., Reunanen, A. 2003. Whole-grain and fiber intake and the incidence of type 2 diabetes. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 77, no. 3, p. 622-629. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/77.3.622 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/77.3.622
Petrenko, V., Spychaj, R., Prysiazhniuk, O., Sheiko, T., Khudolii, L. 2018. Evaluation of three wheat species (Triticum aestivum L., T. spelta L., T. dicoccum (Schrank) Schuebl) commonly used in organic cropping systems, considering selected parameters of technological quality. Romanian Agricultural Research, vol. 2018, no. 35, p. 255-264.
Piergiovanni, A. R., Laghetti, G., Perrino, P. 1996. Characteristics of meal from hulled wheats (Triticum dicoccum Schrank and T. spelta L.): an evaluation of selected accessions. Cereal Chemistry, vol. 73, no. 6, p. 732-735.
Serpen, A., Gökmen, V., Karagöz, A., Köksel, H. 2008. Phytochemical quantification and total antioxidant capacities of Emmer (Triticum dicoccon Schrank) and Einkorn (Triticum monococcum L.) wheat landraces. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 56, no. 16, p. 7285-7292. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf8010855 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/jf8010855
Shewry, P. R., Hey, S. 2015. Do "ancient" wheat species differ from modern bread wheat in their contents of bioactive components? Journal of Cereal Science, vol. 65, p. 236-243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2015.07.014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2015.07.014
Silva, В. A., Ferreres, F., Malva, J. O., Dias, A. C. P. 2005. Phytochemical and antioxidant characterization of Hypericum perforatum alcoholic extracts. Food Chemistry, vol. 90, no. 1-2, p. 157-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.03.049 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.03.049
Stehno, Z. 2007. Emmer wheat Rudico can extend the spectra of cultivated plants. Czech Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding, vol. 43, no. 3, p. 113-115. https://doi.org/10.17221/2072-CJGPB DOI: https://doi.org/10.17221/2072-CJGPB
Verma, B., Hucl, P., Chibbar, R. N. 2009. Phenolic acid composition and antioxidant capacity of acid and alkali hydrolyzed wheat bran fractions. Food Chemistry, vol. 116, no. 4, p. 947-954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.03.060 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.03.060
Vitaglione, P., Napolitano, A., Fogliano, V. 2008. Cereal dietary fibre: a natural functional ingredient to deliver phenolic compounds into the gut. Trends in Food Science and Technology, vol. 19, no. 9, p. 451-463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2008.02.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2008.02.005
Wang, H., Xu, I. 2014. Influence factors on the formation of acrylamide in the chemical model amino acid / sugar. Journal of food and nutrition research, vol. 2, no. 7, p. 344-352. https://doi.org/10.12691/jfnr-2-7-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12691/jfnr-2-7-3
Yermakov, A. I. 1972. Methods for biochemical study of plants. Leningrad, Russia : Kolos, p. 456.
Zaharieva, M., Ayana, N. G., Al Hakimi, A., Misra, S.C., Monneveux, P. 2010. Cultivated emmer wheat (Triticum dicoccon Schrank), an old crop with promising future: a review. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, vol. 57, no. 6, p. 937-962. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-010-9572-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-010-9572-6
Žilić, S., Dodig, D., Basić, Z., Vančetović, J., Titan, P., Đurić, N., Tolimir, N. 2017. Free asparagine and sugars profile of cereal species: the potential of cereals for acrylamide formation in foods. Food Addit. Contam. Part A Chem. Anal. Control Expo. Risk Assess., vol. 34, no. 5, p. 705-713. https://doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2017.1290281 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2017.1290281
How to Cite
This license permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way.