Effect of humic substances and probiotics on growth performance and meat quality of rabbits

Authors

  • Ľubomí­r Ondruška Animal Production Research Centre Nitra, Institute of Small Farm Animals Hlohovecká 2, 951 41 Lužianky
  • Ľubica Chrastinová Animal Production Research Centre Nitra, Institute of Nutrition, Hlohovecká 2, 951 41 Lužianky
  • Ján Rafay Animal Production Research Centre Nitra, Institute of Small Farm Animals Hlohovecká 2, 951 41 Lužianky
  • Darina Pospí­šilová Vetservis s.r.o., Nitra Kalvária 3, 949 01 Nitra
  • Vladimí­r Parkányi Animal Production Research Centre Nitra, Institute of Small Farm Animals Hlohovecká 2, 951 41 Lužianky

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5219/192

Keywords:

meat, quality, rabbits, humic substances, probiotics

Abstract

The aim of this work was determined effect of supplemental humic substances and probiotics on growth performance and meat quality of rabbits.  The growth performances were observed on two hundred and twelve growing rabbits assigned randomly by weight to two treatments. The treatments included: 1) Control group: in this group were rabbits fed with basal diet during all experiment (35th – 77th day), 2) experimental group: the animals were fed with basal diet+3kg/t humic substances – Humac Nature during whole experiment.  In this group was during fattening period (35th – 49th and 63rd – 70th days of age) added to feed the probiotic preparation – Propoul (Lactobacillus fermentum CCM 7158 1x108 CFU) 2 g per ten pieces. Body weight and feed intake were measured weekly in order to determine the average daily gain, average daily feed intake and gain/feed. The characteristics of meat quality were determined on twelve rabbit males at the age of 77 days, when the rabbits achieved average slaughter weight 2500g. Results of the whole experimental period showed that addition humic substances and probiotic preparation to the diet had positive effect (not significantly) on intensity of growth live weight in the last phase of fattening period. The results of this study suggest that humic substances with probiotics might be utilized as a feed additive in the rabbit diet. It could not significantly improve growth performance and meat quality of rabbits.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

AVCI, M., DENEK, N., KAPLAN, O. 2007. Effects of humic acid at different levels on growth performance, carcass yields and some biochemical parameters of quails. In J. Anim. Vet. Adv., vol. 6, 2007, p. 1-4.

HANAFY, M. M., EL-SHEIKH, A. M. H. 2008. The effect of dietary Humic Acid supplementation on some productive and physiological traits of laying hens. In Egypt. Poult. Sci., vol. 28, 2008, p. 1043-1058.

HUCK, J. A., PORTER, N., BUSHED, M. E. 1991. Effect of humates on microbial activity. In Journal of General Microbiology, vol. 137, 1991, p. 2321-2329. https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-137-10-2321 PMid:1770349 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-137-10-2321

JOONÉ, G. K., J. DEKKER, VAN RENSBURG, C. E. J. 2003. Investigation of the Immunostimulatory Properties of Oxyhumate. In Zeitschrift für Naturforschung Redaktion, vol. 58c, 2003, p. 263-267. PMid:12710739 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/znc-2003-3-421

KARAOGLU, M., MACIT, M., ESENBOGA, N., DURDAG, H., TURGUT, L., BILGIN, O.C. 2004. Effect of supplemental humate at different levels on the growth performance slaughter and carcass traits of broilers.

In International Journal of Poultry Science, vol. 3, 2004, p. 406-410. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2004.406.410 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2004.406.410

KOCABAGLI, N., ALP, M., ACAR, N., KAHRAMAN, R. 2002. The effects of dietary humate supplementation on broiler growth and carcass yield. In Poult. Sci., vol. 81, 2002, p. 227-230. PMid:11873831 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/81.2.227

NDAYEGAMIYE, A., COTE, D. 1989. Effect of long-term pig slurry and solid cattle manure application on soil chemical and biological properties. In Can. J. Soil. Sci.,

vol. 69, 1989, p. 39-47. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjss89-005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4141/cjss89-005

SHI, Y., PARKER, D. B., COLE, N. A., AUVERMANN, B. W., MEHLHORN, J. E. 2001. Surface amendments to minimize ammonia emissions from beef cattle feedlots.

In Trans. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng., vol. 44, 2001, p. 677-682.

THIEL, K. D., KLOCKING, R., SCHWEIZER, H., SPROSSIG, M. 1977. Invitro studies of the antiviral activity of ammonium humate against herpes simplex virus type 1 and type 2. In Zentralbl Bakteriol, vol. 239, 1977, p. 304-321.

YALCIN, S., ERGUN, A., EROL, H., YALCIN, S., OZSOY, B. 2005. Use of L-carnitine and humate in laying quail diets. In Acta Veterinaria Hungarica, vol. 53, 2005, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/avet.53.2005.3.9

no 3, p. 361-370. PMid:1615613

YAMADA, E., OZAKI, T., KIMURA, M. 1998. Determination and behavior of humic substances as precursors of trihalomethane in environmental water. In Anal. Sci., vol. 14, 1998, p. 327-332. https://doi.org/10.2116/analsci.14.327 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2116/analsci.14.327

Downloads

Published

2012-03-05

How to Cite

Ondruška, Ľubomí­r ., Chrastinová, Ľubica ., Rafay, J. ., Pospí­šilová, D. ., & Parkányi, V. . (2012). Effect of humic substances and probiotics on growth performance and meat quality of rabbits. Potravinarstvo Slovak Journal of Food Sciences, 6(2), 39–41. https://doi.org/10.5219/192

Most read articles by the same author(s)