Perception of bio-food labeling by consumers in Slovakia
Keywords:bio-food, labeling, consumer, Chi-Square test of Independence, Contingency coefficient and CramerÂ´s V coefficient
The paper presents an overview of the present perception of bio-food labeling by consumers in Slovakia. Analyses were realized by the questionnaire survey organized in the period December 2009 to January 2010. In the survey, 388 respondents were interviewed. From the methodological aspect, basic approaches of descriptive statistics have been used, as well as methods of association measurement. The test of robustness tested Chi-Square statistic. The robustness have been judged based on the p-values. Correlations have been tested through the Contingency coefficient and Cramer´s V coefficient. The survey showed that dependency knowledge of logos was confirmed in terms of knowledge of bio-food, education, type of employment, study at FBP faculty and in terms of choice of organic foods by manufacturers. Students of FBP knows more bio-food logos than other respondents. The second highest dependency was confirmed within selection of bio-food produced individual manufacturers.
BOSTRÖM, M., KLINTMAN, M. 2006. State-centered versus nonstate-driven organic food standardization: A comparison of the US and Sweden. In Agriculture and Human Values, vol. 23, 2006, no 2, p. 163–180.
BOSTRÖM, M. 2006. Regulatory credibility and authority through inclusiveness: Standardization organizations in cases of eco-labelling. In Organization, vol. 13, 2006, no 3, p. 345–367.
BOSTRÖM, M., KLINTMAN, M. 2008. Eco-standards, product labeling, and green consumerism. New York, NY, USA : Palgrave Macmillan. 247 p. ISBN 978-0-230-53737-8.
British Retail Consortium. BRC Global Standard for Food Safety. Issue 5, London, UK : TSO, January 2008. 92 p. ISBN 978-0-11-703791-5.
CARTER, N. 2007. The politics of the environment: Ideas, activism, policy, 2nd ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 432 p. ISBN: 978-0-521-68745-4.
GERTZ, R. 2005. Eco-labelling: A case for deregulation? Law, Probability and Risk., vol. 4, 2005, no. 3, p. 127–141.
HDE - Hauptverband des Deutschen Einzelhandels (Germany), and FCD - Fédération des entreprises du Commerce et de la Distribution (France). IFS International Food Standard. Standard for Auditing Retailer and Wholesaler Branded Food Products. Version 5, Berlin, Germany : HDE Trade Services GmbH, august 2007. 117 p.
HYSING, E. 2009. Governing without government? The private governance of forest certification in Sweden. In Public Administration., vol. 87, 2009, no. 2, p. 312–326.
IBANEZ, L., GROLLEAU, G. 2008. Can Ecolabeling Schemes Preserve the Environment? In Environmental and Resource Economics, vol. 40, 2008, no. 2, p. 233–249.
JORDAN, A., WURZEL, R. K. W, BRŰCKNER, L. 2004. Consumer responsibility-taking and eco-labelling schemes in Europe. In Politics, products, and markets: Exploring political consumerism past and present. ed. M. MICHELETTI, A. FOLLESDAL, AND D. STOLLE, p. 161–180. New Brunswick, New Jersey : Transaction Publishers, 2004. 312 p. ISBN: 978-0-7658-0200-2.
KOZELOVÁ, D., MATEJKOVÁ, E., QINETI, A. 2010. Analyzing consumer´s opinion on organic food, their safety and availability in the slovak food market. In Potravinarstv, vol. 4, 2010, no. 3, p. 30-35. ISSN 1338-0230.
LOHR, L. 1998. Implications of organic certification for market structure and trade. In American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 80, 1998, no. 5, p. 1125–1129. Proceedings Issue. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1244216
MASON, F. 2010. Eco-labeling and market equilibria with noisy certification tests. In Environmental and Resource Economics. Springer Netherlands 2010-09-18.
DOI:10.1007/S10640-010-9402-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-010-9402-5
Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 of 28 June 2007 on organic production and labelling of organic products and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 2092/91. OJ L 189, 20.7.2007, p. 1–23.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 889/2008 of 5 September 2008 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 on organic production and labelling of organic products with regard to organic production, labelling and control. OJ L 250, 18.9.2008, p. 1–84.
Council Regulation (EC) No 967/2008 of 29 September 2008 amending Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 on organic production and labelling of organic products. OJ L 264, 3.10.2008, p. 1–2.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1254/2008 of 15 December 2008 amending Regulation (EC) No 889/2008 laying down detailed rules for implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 on organic production and labelling of organic products with regard to organic production, labelling and control. OJ L 337, 16.12.2008, p. 80–82.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1235/2008 of 8 December 2008 laying down detailed rules for implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 as regards the arrangements for imports of organic products from third countries. OJ L 334, 12.12.2008, p. 25–52.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 710/2009 of 5 August 2009 amending Regulation (EC) No 889/2008 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007, as regards laying down detailed rules on organic aquaculture animal and seaweed production. OJ L 204, 6.8.2009, p. 15–34.
NILSSON, H., TUNCER, B., THIDELL, A. 2004. The use of eco-labeling like initiatives on food products to promote quality assurance - is there enough credibility? In Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 12, 2004, no. 5, p. 517–526.
SONDERSKOV, K. M, DAUGBJERG, C. 2010. The state and consumer confidence in eco-labeling: organic labeling in Denmark, Sweden, The United Kingdom and The United States. In Agriculture and Human Values. Springer Netherlands 2010-11-11.
WARD, R., HUNNICUTT, L., KEITH, J. 2004. If you can’t trust the farmer, who can you trust? The effect of certification types on purchases of organic produce. In International Food and Agribusiness Management Review. vol. 7, 2004, no. 1, p. 60–77.
Zákon NR SR č. 189 z 29. apríla 2009 Z. z. o ekologickej poľnohospodárskej výrobe.
How to Cite
This license permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way.