Impact of somatic cell count and lameness on the production and composition of ewe's milk
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5219/900Keywords:
ewes, lameness, somatic cell count, order of entryAbstract
High somatic cell count (SCC) in milk and lameness are two very serious problems on the farms. The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of lameness, SCC, month and order of entry into the milking parlour on the milk production and its composition. The relationship between lameness and SCC and their impact on the order of entry was also evaluated. The experiment was carried out at the farm, located in northern Slovakia. The farm keeps sheep crossbred of Improved Valachian and Lacaune. Milking was performed two times a day in milking parlor 1x24. Samples of milk were taken once a month by evening milking: May, July. In May, individual milk samples were taken from 214 random sampling ewes with milk yield minimum 300 mL per milking. In July, only from selected ewes in May, the milk samples, milk yield and lameness were recorded. Order of ewes entry into the milking parlour in milking row (one milking row is 24 animals) was recorded in both months. In total 23 milking rows were recorded. Ewes was divided by lameness (non-lame, slightly lame, strong lame), by SCC (A1 = to 2x105 cells, A2 = from 2x105 to 4x105 cells, A3 = from 4x105 to 7x105 cells, A4 = from 7x105 to 10x105 cells, A5 = over 10x105 cells.mL-1) and by the order of entry of ewes into the milking parlour (in first group of ewes were milked in 1-5 rows, second 6-11, third 12-17, fourth 18-23 ones). No effect of lameness was found out on milk yield. Lameness in July affected the order of entry into milking parlour in July as compared with their order of entry recorded in May. The strong lame ewes entered 4.19 ±1.07 milking rows later in July than in May. Only 11.2% and 4.2% of milk samples were found out in a group with SCC >10x105 cells.mL-1 during May and July respectively. In both months, the production of lactose was lower in groups with higher SCC. Ewes entering into the milking parlour earlier had higher SCC as ewes entering into milking parlour later in July but no effect was seen in May. In conclusion the studies under practical conditions deserve continuous research attention to identify risk factors of management affecting lameness and udder health for further improvement of sheep breeding.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Antonič, J., Jackuliaková, L., Uhrinčať, M., Mačuhová, L., Oravcová, M., Tančin, V. 2013. Changes in milk yield and composition after lamb weaning and start of machine milking in dairy ewes. Slovak Journal of Animal Science, vol. 46, no. 3, p. 93-99.
Antonič, J., Tančinová, D., Uhrinčať, M., Tančin, V. 2011. Effect of order of sheep entry into milking parlour on udder health and milk composition. In Risk factors of food chain: 11th international conference. Iwonicz, Poland, September 5-6. 2011. Rzeszów: University of Rzeszow.
Archer, S. C., Green, M. J., Madouasse, A., Huxley, J. N. 2011. Association between somatic cell count and serial locomotion score assessments in UK dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science. vol. 94, no. 9, p. 4383-4388. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2011-4276 PMid:21854911
Arias, R., Oliete, B., Ramon, M., Arias, C., Gallego, R., Montoro, V., Gonzalo, C., Perez-Guzman, M. D. 2012.Long-term study of environmental effects on test-day somatic cell count and milk yield in Manchega sheep. Small Ruminant Research, vol. 106, no. 2-3, p. 92-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2012.03.019
Ariznabarreta, A., Gonzalo, C., San Primitivo, F. 2002. Microbiological quality and somatic cell count of ewe milk with special reference to staphylococci. Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 85, no. 6, p. 1370-1375. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74203-3
Assan, N. 2015. Consequences of stage of lactation on yield and milk composition in sheep. Scientific Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 1-6.
Baranovič, Š., Tančin, V., Mačuhová, L., Uhrinčať, M., Sláma, P. 2016. Somatic cells count in milk of ewes during lactation on selected farms. In: Safety and quality of milk and plant commodities : 37th international conference. Štrbské Pleso, Slovakia, May 18-20. 2016, Košice: The University of Veterinary Medicine.
Berthelot, X., Lagriffoul, G., Concordet, D., Barillet, F., Bergonier, D. 2006. Physiological and pathological thresholds of somatic cell counts in ewe milk. Small Ruminant Research, vol. 62, 2006, p. 27-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2005.07.047
Caboni, P., Manis, C., Ibba, I., Contu, M., Coroneo, V., Scano, P. 2017. Compositional profile of ovine milk with a high somatic cell count: A metabolomics approach. International Dairy Journal, vol. 69, p. 33-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2017.02.001
De Olives, A. M., Díaz, J. R., Molina, M. P., Peris, C. 2013. Quantification of milk yield and composition changes as affected by subclinical mastitis during the current lactation in sheep. Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 96, no. 12, p. 7698-7708. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2013-6998 PMid:24119805
Eze, C. A. 2002. Lameness and reproductive performance in small ruminants in Nsukka Area of the Enugu State, Nigeria. Small Ruminant Research, vol. 44, no. 3, p. 263-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-4488(02)00030-5
Idriss, S. E., Tančin, V., Margetín, M., Tančinová, D., Sláma, P., Havlíček, Z. 2015. The frequency of somatic cell count in dairy ewe's milk. The Journal of Microbiology, Biotechnology and Food Sciences, vol. 4, no. 3, p. 148-151. https://doi.org/10.15414/jmbfs.2015.4.special3.148-151
Gavojdian, D., Budai, C., Cziszter, L. T., Csizmar, N., Javor, A., Kusza, S. 2015. Reproduction efficiency and health traits in Dorper, White Dorper, and Tsigai sheep breeds under temperate European conditions. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, vol. 28, no. 4, p. 599-603. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.14.0659 PMid:25656193
Gelasakis, A. I., Arsenos, G., Valergakis, G. E., Banos, G. 2015.Association of lameness with milk yield and lactation curves in Chios dairy ewes. The Journal of Dairy Research, vol. 82, no. 2, p. 193-199. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022029915000059
Gelasakis, A. I., Arsenos, G., Valergakis, G. E., Fortomaris, P., Banos, G. 2010. Effect of lameness on milk production in a flock of dairy sheep. Veterinary Record, vol. 167, no. 14, p. 533-534. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.c4828 PMid:21257401
Gonzalo, C., Ariznabarreta, A., Carriedo, J. A., San Primitivo, F. 2002. Mammary pathogens and their relationship to somatic cell count and milk yield losses in dairy ewes. Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 85, no. 6, p. 1460-1467. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74214-8
Gorecki, M. T., Wojtowski, J. 2004. Stability of milking order in goat over a long period. Archiv für tierzucht, vol. 47, no. 2, p. 203-208.
Hultgren, J., Manske, T., Bergstern, C. 2004. Associations of sole ulcer at claw trimming with reproductive performance, udder health, milk yield, and culling in Swedish dairy cattle. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, vol. 62, no. 4, p. 233-251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2004.01.002PMid:15068889
Kaler, J., Wassink, G. J., Green, L. E. 2009. The inter- and intra-observer reliability of a locomotion scoring scale for sheep. The Veterinary Journal, vol. 180, no. 2, p. 189-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2007.12.028 PMid:18308594
Komprej, A., Gorjanc, G., Kompan, D., Kovač, M. 2012. Lactation curves for milk yield, fat, and protein content in Slovenian dairy sheep. Czech Journal of Animal Science, vol. 57, no. 5, p. 231-239. https://doi.org/10.17221/5921-CJAS
Leitner, G., Silanikove, N., Merin, U. 2008. Estimate of milk and curd yield loss of sheep and goats with intrammamary infection and its relation to somatic cell count. Small Ruminant Research, vol.74, no. 1, p. 221-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2007.02.009
Margetín, M., Čapistrak, A., Španik, J., Foltys, V. 1996. Somatic cells in sheep milk relation to milk production and composition during sucking and milking. Animal Production-UZPI, vol. 41, no. 12, p. 543-550.
Margetín, M., Milerski, M., Apolen, D., Čapisták, A., Oravcová, Debreceni, O. 2013. Relationships between production, quality of milk and udder health status of ewes during machine milking. Journal of Central European Agriculture, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 328-340. https://doi.org/10.5513/JCEA01/14.1.1203
Margetínová, J., Brouček, J., Apolen, D., Mihina, S. 2001. Order of goats during automatic milking. Slovak Journal of Animal Science, vol. 34, p. 89-96.
Margetínová, J., Brouček, J., Apolen, D., Mihina, S. 2003. Relationship between age, milk production and order of goats during automatic milking. Czech Journal of Animal Science, vol. 48, no. 6, p. 257-263.
Oravcová, M., Margetín, M., Tančin, V. 2015. The effect of stage of lactation on daily milk yield and milk fat and protein content in Tsigai and Improved Valachian ewes. Mljekarstvo, vol. 65, no. 1, p. 48-56. https://doi.org/10.15567/mljekarstvo.2015.0107
Peeler, E. J., Otte, M. J., Esslemont, R. J. 1994. Inter-relationships of periparturient diseases in dairy cows. The Veterinary Record, vol. 134, no. 6, p. 129-132. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.134.6.129 PMid:8171781
Peralta-Lailson, M., Trejo-González, A. Á., Pedraza-Villagómez, P., Berruecos-Villalobos, J. M., Vasquez, C. G. 2005. Factors affecting milk yield and lactation curve fitting in the creole sheep of Chiapas-Mexico. Small Ruminant Research, vol. 58, no. 3, p. 265-273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2004.11.005
Rathore, A. K. 1982. Order of cow entry at milking and its relationships with milk yield and consistency of the order. Applied Animal Ethology, vol. 8, no. 1-2, p. 45-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3762(82)90131-6
Sitkowska, B. 2008. Effect of the cow age group and lactation stage on the count of somatic cells in cow milk. Journal of Central European Agriculture, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 57-62.
Stefanowska, J., Plavsic, M., Ipema, A. H., Hendriks, M. M. W. B. 2000. The effect of omitted milking on the behaviour of cows in the context of cluster attachment failure during automatic milking. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, vol. 6, no. 4, p. 77-291. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(00)00087-3
Tančin, V. 2013. Somatic cell counts in milk of dairy cows under practical conditions. Slovak Journal of Animal Science, vol. 46, no. 1, p. 31-34.
Tančin, V., Ipema, A. H., Hogewerf, P. 2007. Interaction of somatic cell count and quarter milk flow patterns. Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 90, no. 5, p. 2223-2228. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2006-666 PMid:17430921
Tančin, V., Mačuhová, L., Oravcová, M., Uhrinčať, M., Kulinová, K., Roychoudhury, S. H., Marnet, P. G. 2011. Milkability assessment of Tsigai, Improved Valachian, Lacaune and F1Crossbred ewes (Tsigai× Lacaune, Improved Valachian× Lacaune) throughout lactation. Small Ruminant Research, vol. 97, no. 1, p. 28-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2011.01.007
Villagrá, A., Balasch, S., Peris, C., Torres, A., Fernández, N. 2007. Order of sheep entry into the milking parlour and its relationship with their milkability. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, vol. 108, no. 1-2, p. 58-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2006.11.016
Vršková, M., Tančin, V., Kirchnerová, K., Sláma, P. 2015. Impact of selected parameters on milk production in Tsigai breed. The Journal of Microbiology, Biotechnology and Food Sciences, vol. 4, no. 3, p.185-187. https://doi.org/10.15414/jmbfs.2015.4.special3.185-187
Winter, J. R., Kaler, J., Ferguson, E., KilBride, A. L., Green, L. E. 2015. Changes in prevalence of, and risk factors for, lameness in random samples of English sheep flocks: 2004-2013. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, vol. 122, no. 1, p. 121-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2015.09.014 PMid:26435034
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
