Comparison of the sensitivity of determining soyeabean allergens by ELISA method and SYBR green I
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5219/311Keywords:
ELISA, PCR, soybean, allergen, SYBR Green IAbstract
The aim of this study was to compare the suitability of two methods for detecting defatted soybean powder; SYBR Green I Real-time PCR and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Analysis of 20 artificially contaminated samples prepared by simple dilution with wheat flour revealed that both techniques were able to detect defatted soybean powder, although there were significant differences between the two methods. Wheat flour contamination with defatted soybean powder was detected in samples 1-5, (0.012 %; 120 mg.kg-1), but not in samples with lower contamination with soybean powder saples 6-20 using SYBR Green I real-time PCR. Samples 1-10 could not be quantified by ELISA as the absorbance values were greater than the detection limit, and while samples 11-20 were measured, only the values of samples 16, 17 and 18 were within the guaranteed quantification range specified by the ELISA kit manufacturer. Defatted soybean powder contamination was detected in samples 19 and 20, but absorbance values were highly similar to those of the negative control sample.
Downloads
References
Brown, S. G. A., Mullins, R. J., Gold, M. S. 2006. Anaphylaxis: diagnosis and management. The Medical Journal of Australia, vol. 185, p. 283-289. PMid:16948628
Dreskin, S. C. 2006. Genetics of food allergy. Current Allergy and Asthma Reports, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 58-64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11882-006-0012-9 PMid:16476197
Espineira, M., Herrero, B., Vieites, J. M., Santaclara, F. J. 2010. Validation of end-point and real-time PCR methods for the rapid detection of soy allergen in processed products. Food Additives and Contaminants, vol. 27, no. 4, p. 426-432 https://doi.org/10.1080/19440040903493777 PMid: 20178017
Flinterman, A. E., Knulst, A. C., Meijer, Y., Bruijnzeel-Koomen, C. A. F. M., Pasmans, S. G. M. A. 2006. Acute allergic reactions in children with AEDS after prolonged cow's milk elimination diets. Allergy, vol. 61, no. 3, p. 370-374. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1398-9995.2006.01018.x PMid:16436148
Hernández, M., Rodríguez-Lázaro, D., Esteve, T., Prat, S., Pla, M. 2003. Development of melting temperature-based SYBR Green I polymerase chain reaction methods for multiplex genetically modified organism detection. Analytical Biochemistry, vol. 323, no. 2, p. 164-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2003.07.015 PMid:14656521
Heine, R. G., Elsayed, S., Hosking, C. S., Hill, D. J. 2002. Cow's milk allergy in infancy. Current Opinion in Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 2, no. 3, p. 217-225. https://doi.org/10.1097/00130832-200206000-00011 PMid: 12045418
L'Hocine, L., Boye, J.I., Munyana, C. 2007. Detection and quantification of soy allergens in food: study of two commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Journal of Food Science, vol. 72, no. 3, p. C145-153. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2007.00298.x PMid: 17995793
Karudapuram, S., Batey, D. 2008. Detection of Genetically Modified Soybean Detection of Genetically Modified Soybean in Processed Foods Using Real-Time Quantitative PCR with SYBR Green I Dye on the DNA Engine Opticon® 2 System. In Aplication note, vol. 1, 2008, no. 1, Bio - Rad, MJ Research, Inc.
Koppelman, S. J., Lakemond, C. M., Vlooswijk, R., Hefle, S. L. 2004. Detection of soy proteins in processed foods: literature overview and new experimental work. Journal of AOAC International, vol. 87, no. 6, p. 1398-1407 PMid:15675452
Novembre, E., Vierucci, A. 2001. Milk allergy/intolerance and atopic dermatitis in infancy and childhood. Allergy, vol. 56, no. S67, p. 105-108 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1398-9995.2001.00931.x PMid:11298023
Pedersen, M. H., Holzhauser, T., Bisson, C., Conti, A., Jensen, L. B., Skov, P. S., Poulsen, L. K. 2008. Soybean allergen detection methods - A comparison study. Molecular Nutrition and Food Research, vol. 52, no. 12, p. 1486-1496 https://doi.org/10.1002/mnfr.200700394
Tengel, C., Schüßler, P., Setzke, E., Balles, J., Sprenger-Haußels, M. 2001. PCR-based detection of genetically modified soybean and maize in raw and highly processed foodstuffs. BioTechniques, vol. 31, no. 2, p. 426-429. PMid:11515380
Wang W. Y., Fang T. J. 2005. Development of multiplex and quantitative PCR assay to detect genetically modified roundup ready soybean in foods. Journal of Food and Drug Analysis, 13, p. 132-138
Zhang, M., Gao, X., Yu, Y., Ao, J., Qin, J., Yao, Y. Li, Q. 2007. Detection of Roundup Ready soy in highly processed products by triplex nested PCR. Food Control, vol. 18, no. 10, p. 1277-1281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2006.09.001
Žiarovská, J., Fernández, E., Millela, L. 2013. A revised ITS nucleotide sequence gives a specifity for smallanthus sonchifolius (Poepp. and Endl.) and its products identification. Genetika. vol. 45, no. 1, p. 217-226. https://doi.org/ 10.2298/GENSR1301217Z
Žiarovská, J., Poláčeková P. 2012 Efficiency of real-time PCR for 18S RRNA amplification of Sorbus domestica, L.. Potravinarstvo. vol. 6, no. 3, p. 47-49. https://doi.org/10.5219/203
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).