A comparative study of Sus scrofa M. longissimus dorsi with different changes in quality
Keywords:muscle proteins, pork, PSE, DFD, electrophoresis
The comparative study of Sus scrofa muscle tissue with different defects of quality was carried out. Such analysis methods as determination of water-binding capacity (WBC) and pH values, microstructural studies, proteome methods, mass spectrometric methods, high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and determine the concentration of cathepsin D, calpain 3 and myoglobin were applied in current study. DFD meat was characterized by high pH (6.2) and WBC (93.18%), while PSE - low pH (5.5) and WBC (79.19%). pH and WBC values in NOR pork was medium and averaged 5.9 and 92.05%, respectively. Microstructural studies revealed that fiber in exudative pork was the least and averaged 39.7 µm, normal pork was characterized by diameter of muscle of 45.5 µm, while DFD pork ‑ 48.3 µm. Protein composition of Sus scrofa muscle tissues were also investigated by one-dimensional and two-dimensional electrophoresis. 6 protein fractions were identified by mass spectrometry and confirmed as potential biomarkers of pork quality defects in meat and processes meat product. It also has been shown that PSE pork contains 8 characteristic peptides, NOR - 14, DFD - 18. Cathepsin D, calpain 3 and myoglobin content were measured in pork of different categories. The highest content of cathepsin D, calpain 3 and myoglobin was noticed in PSE pork and averaged 82.16 ±3.30 ng.mL-1; 1.280 ±0.082 ng.mL-1; 3.973 ±0.506 ng.mL-1, respectively. Since the study was carried out on samples of meat 24 hours after slaughter, this work had the prospect to further study of meat with different defects of quality during long-term autolysis.
Adzitey, F., Nurul, H. 2011. Pale Soft Exudative (PSE) and Dark Firm Dry (DFD) Meats: Causes and measures to reduce these incidences. International Food Research Journal, vol. 18, p. 11-20.
Barbut, S., Sosnicki, A.A., Lonergan, S. M., Knapp, T., Ciobanu, D. C., Gatcliffe, L. J., Huff-Lonergan, E., Wilson, E. W. 2008. Progress in reducing the pale, soft and exudative (PSE) problem in pork and poultry meat. Meat science, vol. 79, no. 1, p. 46-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.07.031 PMid:22062597 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.07.031
Bazhov, G. M., Kryshtop, E. A., Baranikov A. I. 2013. Technological characteristics of pork with PSE and DFD defects. Scientific journal KubGAU, vol. 89, p. 973-984.
De Almeida, A. M., Bendixen, E. 2012. Pig proteomics: a review of a species in the crossroad between biomedical and food sciences. Journal of Proteomics, vol. 75, no. 14, p. 4296-4314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2012.04.010 PMid:22543283 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2012.04.010
Flores, M., Toldra, F. 2014. Optimization of Muscle Enzyme Colorimetric Tests for Rapid Detection of Exudative Pork Meats. Food Analytical Methods. vol. 7, no. 9, p. 1903-1907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-014-9834-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-014-9834-6
Kopeikina, L. V., Chudzickaya, E. V. 2005. The study of quality and safety of pork. Eastern Federal University. Economics and management, no. 2, p. 54-60.
Kovalyov, L. I., Shishkin, S. S., Kovalyova, M. A., Ivanov, A. V., Vostrikova, N. L., Chernukha, I. M. 2013. Proteomic study of proteins in pork and meat products. All about meat, vol. 3, р. 32-34.
Laemmli, U. K. 1970.Cleavage of Structural Proteins during the Assembly of the Head of Bacteriophage T4. Nature, vol. 227, p. 680-685. https://doi.org/10.1038/227680a0 PMid:5432063 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/227680a0
Luca, A. D., Elia, G., Hamill, R., Mullen, A. M. 2013. 2D DIGE proteomic analysis of early post mortem muscle exudate highlights the importance of the stress response for improved water-holding capacity of fresh pork meat. Journal of Proteomics, vol. 13, no. 9, p. 1528-1544. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.201200145 PMid:23456991 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.201200145
O'Farrell, P. H. 1975. High resolution two-dimensional electrophoresis of proteins. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 250, no. 10, p. 4007-4021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(19)41496-8
Poznyakovskiya, V. M., Gorlov, I. F., Tikhonov, S. L., Shelepov, V. G. 2015. About the quality of meat with PSE and DFD properties. Foods and Raw Materials, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 104-110. https://doi.org/10.12737/11244 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12737/11244
UniProtKB, 2002-2016. Protein Knowledgebase [online] s.a. [cit. 2017-01-17] Available at: http://www.uniprot.org.
Shipulin, V. I. 2009. Principles of the development of alternative variants of rational technologies of meat products of new generation with adapted food additives, Avt. diss. Dr. technical sciences, Stavropol, Russia. p. 44.
How to Cite
LicenseAuthors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).