Health and hygienic conditions of ewe's milk processing from the aspect of food safety
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5219/24Keywords:
ewe´s milk, quality, safety, Staphylococcus aureus, staphylococciAbstract
Totally, 47 strains of S. aureus and 578 coagulase negative staphylococci were detected in samples from raw ewe milk. The 35 out 47 isolates of S. aureus from ewe milk were positive for the presence of staphylococcal enterotoxin genes: sea(4 %), sec (48 %) a sed (48 %). Staphylococcus epidermis (33.04%), Staphylococcus caprae (21.28%) were more prevalent. Staphylococcus chromogenes (7.44 %), Staphylococcus hominis (7.09%), Staphylococcus xylosus (6,92 %), a Staphylococcus warneri (6.40 %) were isolated also in ewes milk. Staphylococcus haemolyticus (3.11 %), Staphylococcus capitis (2.94 %), Staphylococcus simulans (2.08 %) and Staphylococcus saprophyticus (1.73 %) were isolated very rarely from the taken individual milk ewe samples. Sporadically, only in few cases, the others coagulase negative staphylococci were isolated (< 1 %): Staphylococcus cohnii cohnii, Staphylococcus sciuri, Staphylococcus closii, Staphylococcus lugdunensis, Staphylococcus auricularis and Staphylococcus equorum.
Downloads
References
ARIZNABARETTA, A., GONZALO, C., PRIMITIVO, F. S. 2002. Microbiological quality and somatic cell count of ewe milk with special reference to staphylococci. In J. Dairy Sci., vol. 85, 2002, p. 1370-1375.
https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74203-3
BAUTISTA, L. et al. 1988. A quantitative study of enterotoxin production by sheep milk staphylococci. In Appl. Environ. Microbiol., vol. 54, 1988, 56-65.
BEDNÁŘ, M., FRAŇKOVÁ, V., SCHINDLER, J., SOUČEK, A., VÁVRA, J. 1996. Lékařská mikrobiologie. Praha, Marvil, ISBN 80 217 0282 6.
BERGONIER, D., BERTHELOT, X. 2003: new advances in epizootology and control of ewe mastitis. In Livestock Prod. Sci., vol. 79, 2003, p. 1-16.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(02)00145-8
BIGGS, A. 2009. Mastitis in cattle. Crowood Press Ltd. Ramsbury, Marlborough. ISBN 978 1 84797 0 71 8.
BURDOVÁ, O., LAUKOVÁ, A., KORÉNEKOVÁ, B., BARANOVÁ, M., BENGIN, V., PAŽÁKOVÁ, J. 2007. Staphylococcus aureus – biologické riziko v procese zretia hrudkového syra. IN: Zb. Hygiena Alimentorum XXVIII. Štrbské Pleso, 2.-4. mája 2007, p. 248-253.
CASALI, C., DURANTI, E., MORBIDINI, L., PANELLA, F., VIZIOLI, V. 1989. Quantitative and compositional variations of Massese sheep milk by parity and stage lof actation. In Small Ruminant Res., vol. 2, 1989, p. 47-62.
CONTRERAS, A., CORRALES, J. C., SÁNCHEZ, A., SIERRA, D. 1997. Perzistance of subclinical intramammary pathogens in goats throughot lactation. In J. Dairy Sci., vol. 80, 1997, p. 2815-2819.
https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)76245-3
CONTRERAS, A., LUENGO, C., SÁNCHEZ CORRALES, J. C. 2003. The role of the intramammary pathogens in dairy goats. In Livestock Prod. Sci., vol. 79, p. 273-283.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(02)00172-0
DARIO, C., LAUDADIO, V., BUFANO, G. 1995. Characteristics of Leccese sheep. II. Quantitative and qualitative variations in milk during lactation. In Latte, 20, 1995, 1266-1269.LEINTNER, G., CHAFFER, M., SHAMAY, A., SHAPIRO, F., MERIN, U., EZRA, E., SARAN, A., SILANIKOVE, S. 2004. Changes in milk composition as affected by subclinical mastitis in sheep. In J. Dairy Sci., vol. 87, 1995, p. 46-52.
DUDRIKOVÁ, E. 2000. Vplyv mikrobiálnej kontaminácie mlieka a rezíduí niektorých antibiotík na hygienickú a technologickú kvalitu surového kravského mlieka. Habilitačná práca, Košice, 2000, 169p.
EDWARDS, V.M. et al. 1997. Characterization of the canine type C enterotoxin produced by Staphylococcus intermediuspyoderma isolates. In Infect. Immun., 65, p. 2246-2352.
FENYVESSY, J., CSANADI, J. 1999. Nutritional evaluation of components of small ruminants´(ewe´s, goat´s) milk. InTejgazdasag, vol. 59, 1999, p. 23-26.
GONZALO, C., ARIZNABARRETA, A., CARRIEDO, J. A., PRIMITIVO, F. S. 2002. Mamary pathogens and their relathionship to somatic cell count and milk yield losses in dairy ewes. In J. Dairy Sci., vol. 85, p. 1460-1467.
https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74214-8
HARDY, G. 2000. The nutritional value of sheep milk: a natural supplement for clinical nutrition. In: Proceed. Int. Development Strategy for the Sheep and Goat Dairy Sector, Nicosia, Cyprus, April 13-14, 2000, Brit. Sheep Dairy News, vol. 17, no 1, p. 23-24.
HEIN, I., JØRGENSEN, H. J., LONCAREVIC, S., WAGNER, M. 2005. Quantification of Staphylococcus aureus in unpasteurised bovine and caprine milk by real-time PCR. In Res. Microbiol.,156, p. 554-563.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resmic.2005.01.003
PMid:15862454
HERIAN, K. 2007. Súčasnosť a perspektíva ovčieho a kozieho mliekarstva na Slovensku. In: Zborník Hygiena Alimentorum XXVIII, Štrbské Pleso - Vysoké Tatry, 2., 4. máj, 2007, s. 51-57.
MARTINEAU, F. et al. 1998. Species-specific and ubiquitous-DNA-based assays for rapid identification of Staphylococcus aureus. In J. Clin. Microbiol., vol. 36, p. 618-623.
PMid:9508283
PMCid:104596
HOLEČKOVÁ, B., HOLODA, E., FOTTA, M., KALINÁČOVÁ, V., GONDOL, J., GROLMUS, J. 2002. Occurence of enterotoxigenic Staphylococus aureus in food. In Ann. Agric. Environ. Med., vol. 9, p. 179-182.
LAFFAN, J. J., PETRAS, P., LAMBE, D.W. Jr. 1996. A high molecular weight protein from Staphylococcus intermediuscross.reacts with Staphylococccus aureus enterotoxin antibodies. In Microbios, vol. 88, 1996, p. 237-251.
PMid:9178533
MARGENTÍN, M. 1996. Present state in sheep breeding in Slovakia, with regard to somatic cell counts. In: Proceed. Int. Symposium Somatic cells and milk of small ruminants. Bella, italy, Sept. 25-27, 1996, p. 321-322.
MINOR, T. E., MARTH, E. H. 1976. Staphylococci and their significance in food. Theodor E. Minor and Elmer H. Marth Elsevier Scientific Pub. Co., Amsterdam, New York, ISBN 13 9780 4444 13390.
PAAPE, M. J., POULTREL, B., CONTRERAS, A., MARCO, J. C., CAPUCO, A. V. 2001. Milk somatic cells and lactation in small ruminants. J. Dairy Sci., vol. 84 (Suppl.), 2001, p. E237-E244.
https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(01)70223-8
POSATI, L. P., ORR, M. L. 1976. Composition of foods, dairy and egg products. USDA-ARS, Consumer & Food Economics Inst. Publ., Washington, D.C., Agr. Handbook, No. 8-1, p. 77-109.
SAMBROOK, J., FRITSCH, E. F., MANIATIS. T. 1989. Molecular Cloning: A laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory. Cold Spring Harbor. New York, 253 p.
STROMMENGER, B., KETTLITZ. C., WERNER, G., WITTE, W. 2003. Multiplex PCR assay for simultaneous detction of nine clinically relevant antibiotic resistance genes in Staphylococcus aureus. In J. Clin. Microbiol., vol. 41, p. 4089 – 4094.
https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.41.9.4089-4094.2003
PMid:12958230
PMCid:193808
TKÁČIKOVÁ, Ľ., TESFAYE, A., MIKULA, I. 2003. Detection of genes for Staphylococus aureus enterotoxin by PCR. In Acta Vet. Brno, vol. 72, 2003. p. 627-630.
TZORA, A., FTHENAKIS, G. C. 1999. Mastitis associated with Serratia marcescens in dairy ewes. In 6th International Symposium on the milking small ruminants. Atenas (Grecia). Milking and milk production of dairy sheep and goats. Ed. Barillet, F., Zervas, N.P., Wageningen Pers., p. 142-143.
UDO, E. E., AL-BUSTAN, M. A., JACOB, L. E., CHUGH, T. D. 1999. Enterotoxin production by coagulase-negative staphylococci in restaurant workers from Kuwait City may be a potential case of food poisoning. In J. Medical Microbiol., vol. 48, 1999, p. 819-823.
https://doi.org/10.1099/00222615-48-9-819
PMid:10482292
WINTER, P., SCHILCHER, F., BAGO, Z., SCHODER, D., EGERBACHER, M., BAUMGARTNER, W., WAGNER, M. 2004. Clinical and histopathological aspects of naturally occuring mastitis caused by Listeria monocytogenes in cattle and ewes. In J. Vet. Med., Series B 51, 2004, p. 176-179.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).