Comparison of heat-stable peptides using a multiple-reaction monitoring method to identify beef muscle tissue
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5219/1317Keywords:
biomarker, LC-MS/MS, prototype peptides, meat authentication, heat-stable peptideAbstract
Nowadays, proteomics is widely used as an analytical control method. A new method for determining animal tissue species-specificity based on a combination of two effective methods of food analysis, liquid chromatography (LC) and mass spectrometry (MS), was used in this work. Using this approach, it became possible to detect peptides. This work presents a comparison of species-specific, heat-stable peptides for the identification of beef. The objects of the study were native and boiled model mixtures containing beef with concentrations of 8% (w/w) and 16% (w/w). Pork was also added to the recipe to control for false-positive results. A high-performance liquid chromatography technique with mass spectrometric detection (LC-MS/MS) was used. Analysis of finished samples takes 25 minutes and is adapted to detect marker peptides. From the processing of the obtained data, three beef marker peptides were identified that were accepted as the best candidates. Two peptide prototypes, NDMAAQYK and YLEFISDAIIHVLHAK from the myoglobin protein and SNVSDAVAQSAR from the triosephosphate isomerase protein, were selected as potential biomarkers. For all samples, the signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) was set above 10. Temperature was not found to affect the structure and detection of marker peptides in samples with a muscle tissue concentration of 8% (w/w) at p <0.05. This approach is universally applicable for comparing biomarkers of other types of meat and to identify the most suitable candidates.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Claydon, A., Grundy, H., Charlton, A., Romero, M. 2015. Identification of novel peptides for horse meat speciation in highly processed foodstuffs. Food Addit Contam—Part A Chem. Anal. Control. Expo. Risk Asses., vol. 32, no. 10, p. 1718-1729. https://doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2015.1075256 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2015.1075256
Fornal, E., Montowska, M. 2019. Species-specific peptide‐based liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry monitoring of three poultry species in processed meat products. Food Chem, vol. 283, p. 489-498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.01.074 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.01.074
Khvostov, D., Vostrikova, N., Zherdev, A., Zvereva, E., Kurzova, A. 2019. Identifikatsiya i kolichestvennoye opredeleniye myshechnoy tkani na osnove kontrolya prototipicheskikh peptidov s ispol'zovaniyem metoda monitoringa zadannykh reaktsiy (Quantitative identification of muscular tissue by the means of protototic peptides using the multiple reaction monitoring method). Analitika i kontrol’, vol. 23, no. 4, p. 580-586. https://doi.org/10.15826/analitika.2019.23.4.012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15826/analitika.2019.23.4.012
Kopylov, A., Zgoda, V. 2007. Kolichestvennye metody v proteomike (Quantitative Methods in Proteomics). Biomeditsinskaia khimiia, vol. 53, no. 6, p. 613-643. (In Russian)
Kopylov, A., Zgoda, V., Archakov, A. 2009. Kolichestvennyi mass-spektrometricheskii analiz soderzhaniia belkov v biologicheskikh probakh bez ispol'zovaniia izotopnykh metok (Quantitative mass spectrometric analysis of protein content in biological samples without the use of isotopic tags). Biomeditsinskaia khimiia, vol. 55, no. 2, p. 125-139. (In Russian)
Kulikovskii, A., Vostrikova, N., Chernukha, I., Khvostov, D. 2019. Quantitative Identification of Muscle Tissue by Means of Biomarker Peptides by Using Method of Multiple Reaction Monitoring. J. Oriental of Chimistry, vol. 35, no. 4, p. 1327-1331. https://doi.org/10.13005/ojc/350411 DOI: https://doi.org/10.13005/ojc/350411
Leitsätze für Fleisch und Fleischerzeugnisse, 2016. Available at: https://www.bmel.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/Ernaehrung/Lebensmittelbuch/LeitsaetzeFleisch.html.
Li, Y., Zhang, Y., Li, H., Zhao, W., Guo, W., Wang, S. 2018. Simultaneous determination of heat stable peptides for eight animal and plant species in meat products using UPLC-MS/MS method. Food Chem, vol. 245, p. 125-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.09.066 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.09.066
Montowska, M., Fornal, E. 2017. Label-free quantification of meat proteins for evaluation of species composition of processed meat products. Food Chem., vol. 237, no. 15, p. 1092-1100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.06.059 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.06.059
Montowska, M., Fornal, E. 2019. Absolute quantification of targeted meat and allergenic protein additive peptide markers in meat products. Food Chem., vol. 274, p. 857-864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.08.131 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.08.131
Naveena, B., Jagadeesh, D., Babu, A., Rao, T., Kamuni, V., Vaithiyanathan, S. Kulkarni, V. K., Rapole, S. 2017. OFFGEL electrophoresis and tandem mass spectrometry approachcompared with DNA-based PCR method for authentication of meat species from rawand cook ground meat mixtures containing cattle meat, water buffalo meat and sheep meat. Food Chem., vol. 233, p. 311-320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.04.116 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.04.116
Prandi, B., Lambertini, F., Faccini, A., Suman, M., Leporati, A., Tedeschi, T., Sforza, S. 2017. Mass spectrometry quantification of beef and pork meat in highly processed food: Application on Bolognese sauce. Food Contro, vol. 74, p. 61-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.11.032 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.11.032
Prandi, B., Varani, M., Faccini, A., Lambertini, F., Suman, M., Leporati, A., Tedeschi, T., Sforza, S. 2019. Species specific marker peptides for meat authenticity assessment: A multispecies quantitative approach applied to Bolognese sauce. Food Control, vol. 97, p. 15-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2018.10.016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2018.10.016
Ruiz Orduna, A., Husby, E., Yang, C., Ghosh, D., Beaudry, F. 2015. Assessment of meat authenticity using bioinformatics, targeted peptide biomarkers and high-resolution mass spectrometry. Food Addit Contam—Part A Chem. Anal. Control. Expo. Risk Assess., vol. 32, no. 10, p. 1709-1717. https://doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2015.1064173 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2015.1064173
Ruiz Orduna, A., Husby, E., Yang, C., Ghosh, D., Beaudry, F. 2017. Detection of meat species adulteration using high-resolution mass spectrometry and a proteogenomics strategy. Food Addit Contam—Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess, vol. 34, no. 7, p. 1110-1120. https://doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2017.1329951 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2017.1329951
Sarah, S., Faradalila, W., Salwani, M., Amin, I., Karsani, S., Sazili, A. 2016. LC-QTOF‐MS identification of porcine‐specific peptide in heat treated pork identifies candidate markers for meat species determination. Food Chem., vol. 199, p. 157-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.11.121 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.11.121
Sentandreu, M., Fraser, P., Halket, J., Patel, R., Bramley, P. 2010. A proteomic based approach for detection of chicken in meat mixes. Journal of Proteome Research, vol. 9, no. 7, p. 3374-3383. https://doi.org/10.1021/pr9008942 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/pr9008942
Skyline program. 2019. Available at: https://skyline.ms/project/home/software/Skyline/begin.view
Stachniuk, A., Sumara, A., Montowska, M., Fornal, E. 2019. Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry bottom‐up proteomic methods in animal species analysis of processed meat for food authentication and the detection of adulterations. Mass Spectrometry Reviews, vol. 00, p. 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1002/mas.21605 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mas.21605
Von Bargen, C., Brockmeyer, J., Humpf, H. 2014. Meat authentication: A new HPLC–MS/MS based method for the fast and sensitive detection of horse and pork in highly processed food. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 62, no. 39, p. 9428-9435. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf503468t DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/jf503468t
Wang, G. J., Zhou, G. Y., Ren, H. W., Xu, Y., Yang, Y., Guo, L. H., Liu, N. 2018. Peptide biomarkers identified by LC–MS in processed meats of five animal species. J. Food Comp. Anal., vol. 73, p. 47-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2018.07.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2018.07.004
Watson, A., Gunning, Y., Rigby, N., Philo, M., Kemsley, E. 2015. Meat authentication via multiple reaction monitoring mass spectrometry of myoglobin peptides. Anal. Chem., vol. 87, no. 20, p. 10315-10322. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.5b02318 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.5b02318
Zav'yalova, M., Zgoda, V., Kharybin, O., Nikolayev, Y. 2014. Poluchenie peptidnogo standarta dlia srmmetoda s pomoshch'iu fosforilirovaniia in vitro (Preparation of a peptide standard for the srm method using in vitro phosphorylation). Biomeditsinskaia khimiia, vol. 60, no. 6, p. 668-676. https://doi.org/10.18097/PBMC20146006668 (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.18097/PBMC20146006668
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This license permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way.
