Does foodservice industry care about CSR? A study in Portugal and Ukraine


  • Oksana Sokil Slovak University of Agriculture, Faculty of Economics and Management, Department of Management, Trieda A. Hlinku 2, 949 76 Nitra, Slovakia, Tel.: +421 944 413 793
  • Iveta Ubrežiová Catholic University in Ružomberok, Faculty of Education, Department of Management, Nábrežie Jána Pavla II., č. 15, 058 01 Poprad, Slovakia
  • Teresa Eugenio School of Technology and Management, CARME – Centre of Applied Research in Management and Economics, Polytechnic Institute of Leiria, Morro do Lena - Alto Vieiro, 2411-901 Leiria, Portugal
  • Tânia Marques School of Technology and Management, CARME – Centre of Applied Research in Management and Economics, Polytechnic Institute of Leiria, Morro do Lena - Alto Vieiro, 2411-901 Leiria, Portugal



Corporate Social Responsibility, Food service Industry, SMEs, Portugal, Ukraine


The purpose of the article is to compare the CSR perception level of the food service industry in Portugal and Ukraine. The main goal of the study is to find the attitudes in Portugal and in Ukraine towards CSR. Additionally, two hypotheses were formulated to understand the possible relation between (1) the financial situation and (2) the duration of the company with the awareness level about the CSR concept. A quantitative approach, using questionnaires, was adopted to survey using a sample of 201 representatives of SMEs in the foodservice sector (101 Portuguese and 100 Ukrainian), in 2019. Descriptive statistics and Spearman test were used to analyze the data. The present work demonstrates a significant correlation between the financial situation of the company and the CSR awareness level of leadership. Furthermore, the research shows that activities related to the economic sphere and CSR workplace policy among food sector companies in Ukraine and Portugal are developed to a great extent. From this point of view, we can state, that the publication of the article is one of the results and supported by grant project KEGA 005SPU-4/2019 “Theory and Practice of the International Management and Entrepreneurship in Multicultural Environment”. In this study, two different countries were chosen (Portugal and Ukraine), which are different in culture, history, and economic background. The paper focused on the food service industry and contributes to the ongoing debate about the SMEs and its involvement with CSR. It also helps schools to identify plans in CSR policy and topics for future research.


Download data is not yet available.


Metrics Loading ...


Aras, G., Crowther, D. 2008. Governance and sustainability. Management Decision, vol. 46, no. 3, p. 433-448. DOI:

Aßländer, M. S. 2011. Corporate Social Responsibility as a subsidiary co-responsibility: a macroeconomic perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 99, no. 1, p. 115-128. DOI:

Behringer, K., Szegedi, K. 2016. The role of CSR in achieving sustainable development-theoretical approach. European Scientific Journal, vol. 12., no. 22, p. 10-25. DOI:

Branco, M. C., Delgado, C. 2011. Research on corporate social responsibility and disclosure in Portugal. Social Responsibility Journal, vol. 7, no. 2, p. 202-217. DOI:

Boeprasert, A. 2012. Does geographical proximity affect corporate social responsibility? Evidence from the U.S. market. International Business Research, vol. 5, no. 9, p. 138-147. DOI:

Burja, V., Mihalache, S. S. 2010. Corporate Social Responsibility. Example Rosia Montana Gold Corporation. Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, vol. 2, no. 12, p. 523-532. DOI:

Burkovska, A., Lunkina, T. 2016. Zakonodavche rehulyuvannya korporatyvnoyi sotsialʹnoyi vidpovidalʹnosti v Ukrayini potrebuye udoskonalennya. (Legislation regulating corporate social responsibility in Ukraine needs improvement). Halytsky Economic Bulletin, vol. 50, no. 1, p. 32-37. (In Ukrainain)

Carroll, A. B. 1979. A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate social performance. Academy of management review, vol. 4, no. 4, p. 497-505. DOI:

Clarkson, M. B .E. 1995. A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporation social performance. Academy of management review, vol. 20, no. 1, p. 92-117. DOI:

Duman, U. D., Giritli, H., McDermott, P. 2016. Corporate social responsibility in the construction industry: A comparative study between the UK and Turkey. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, vol. 6, no. 2, p. 218-231. DOI:

Ebner, D., Baumgartner, R. J. 2006. The relationship between sustainable development and corporate social responsibility. Corporate Responsibility Research Conference. Queens University, Belfast, Dublin, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 61-82. DOI:

Elkington, J. 1999. Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st‐century business. Enviromental Quality Management, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 37-51. DOI:

Fauzi, H., Idris, K. 2009. The relationship of CSR and financial performance: new evidence from Indonesian companies. Issues in Social and Environmental Accounting, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 1-24. DOI:

Fauzi, H., Svensson, G., Rahman, A. A. 2010. “Triple bottom line” as “Sustainable corporate performance”: A proposition for the future. Sustainability, vol. 2, no. 5, p. 1345-1360. DOI:

GIRA Foodservice. 2017. Portuguese foodservice market 2017. Available at:

Halasi, D., Schwarcz, P., Mura, L., Roháčiková, O. 2019. The impact of EU support resources on business success of family-owned businesses. Potravinarstvo Slovak Journal of Food Sciences, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 846-853. DOI:

Hirnyak, L. I., Glagola, V. A. 2018. Suchasnyy stan, perspektyvy ta tendentsiyi rozvytku restorannoho hospodarstva v Ukrayini. (Current state, prospects and trends in the restaurant industry in Ukraine). Economics and Business Management, vol. 16, p. 71-78. Available at: (In Ukrainian)

INE. 2018. Statistics Portugal - Web Portal. Available at:

ISO 26000. 2010. Guiadance on social responsibility, Available at:

Janošková, M., Csikósová, A. 2019. Corporate culture as one of the factors of global management in multinational companies. In 3rd International Conference: proceedings Poprad Current trends and challenges in businesses management. Ružomberok, Slovakia : VERBUM, p. 241-249. ISBN 978-80-561-0671-6.

John, K., Knyazeva, A., Knyazeva, D. 2011. Does geography matter? Firm location and corporate payout policy. Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 101, no. 3, p. 533-551. DOI:

Kasych, A. 2014. Vtilennya kontseptsiyi stratehichnoho upravlinnya v praktyku vitchyznyanykh pidpryyemstv. (Implementation of the concept of strategic management in the practice of domestic enterprises). Business Inform., vol. 11, p. 290-294. (In Ukrainian)

Kasych, A. O., Yakovenko, Y. Y. 2014. Zvit pro stiykyy rozvytok yak analitychnyy instrument formuvannya korporatyvnoyi sotsialʹnoyi vidpovidalʹnosti (The report on the stick flow as an analytical tool for the formation of corporate social responsibility). Effective Economics, vol. 10. (In Ukrainian)

Kolk, A., Van Tulder, R. 2010. International business, corporate social responsibility and sustainable development. International Business Review, vol. 19, no. 2, p. 119-125. DOI:

Kolyanko, O. V., Myronov, Y. B. 2016. Sotsialʹna vidpovidalʹnistʹ u turystychnomu biznesi (Social visibility in the tourism business). In 12th International Scientific and Practical Conference: proceedings. Modern Problems of Management. Kiev : National Aviation University, p. 42-43. (In Ukrainian)

Kostyrko, R. O. 2014. Perspektyvy mizhnarodnoyi intehrovanoyi zvitnosti (Prospects for international integrated reporting). Bulletin of the National University Lviv Polytechnic. Management and entrepreneurship in Ukraine: the stage of formation and problems of development, vol. 794, p. 181-187. (In Ukrainian)

Kovach, M. 2013. Formuvannya stratehichnoho potentsialu pidpryyemstva (Formation of strategic potential of the enterprise). Scientific Bulletin NLTU Ukraine, vol. 23, no. 10, p. 207-212. (In Ukrainian)

Kravchenko, V. 2013. Menedzhment: Navchalʹnyy posibnyk (Management: Navchalnyymanual). Odesa : Atlant. (In Ukrainian)

Lee, M. D. P. 2008. A review of the theories of corporate social responsibility: Its evolutionary path and the road ahead. International Journal of Management Reviews, vol. 10, no. 1, p.53-73. DOI:

Loughran, T., Schultz, P. 2005. Liquidity: Urban versus rural firms. In Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 78, no. 2, p. 341-374. DOI:

Loureiro, S. M. C., Sardinha, I. M. D., Reijnders, L. 2012. The effect of corporate social responsibility on consumer satisfaction and perceived value: the case of the automobile industry sector in Portugal. Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 37, p. 172-178. DOI:

Marushchak, N. V. 2012. Teoriyi korporatyvnoyi sotsialʹnoyi vidpovidalʹnosti u svitoviy praktytsi. (Theories of Corporate Social Responsibility in practice). Current problems of international relations, vol. 111, no. 2, p. 209-219. (In Ukrainian)

McWilliams, A., Siegel, D. 2001. Corporate Social Responsibility: a theory of firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, vol. 26, no. 1, p. 117-127. DOI:

Moore, G. 2001. Corporate social and financial performance: an investigation in the UK supermarket industry. Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 34, no. 3/4, p. 299-315. DOI:

Ness, M. R. 1992. Corporate social responsibility. British Food Journal, vol. 94, no. 7, p. 38-44. DOI:

Nyarku, K. M., Ayekple, S. 2019. Influence of corporate social responsibility on non-financial performance. Social Responsibility Journal, vol. 15, no. 7, p. 910-923. DOI:

Okhrimenko, O. O., Ivanova, T. V. 2015. Sotsialʹna vidpovidalʹnistʹ (Social visibility). Educational bulletin. National Technological University of Ukraine. Kiev : Polytechnic Institute. (In Ukrainian)

Orlitzky, M., Benjamin, J. D. 2001. Corporate social performance and firm risk: a meta-analytic review. Business & Society, vol. 40, no. 4, p. 369-396. DOI:

Patten, D. M. 2002. The relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: a research note. Accounting Organizations and Society, vol. 27, no. 8, p. 763-773. DOI:

Rubenstein, R. 2003. A keynote: triple bottom line investing. International Journal of Business Performance Management, vol. 5, no. 2, p. 109-113. DOI:

Sardak, S., Shmyhovska, O. H. 2017. Aktyvizatsiya zakhodiv korporatyvnoyi sotsialʹnoyi vidpovidalʹnosti v ukrayinsʹkomu biznes-seredovyshchi: motyvy, problemy ta napryamy. (Activation of visiting corporate social visibility in the Ukrainian business environment: motives, problems and directions). Economics and management of national economy, vol. 11, p. 11-16. (In Ukrainian)

Secchi, D. 2007. Utilitarian, managerial and relational theories of corporate social responsibility. International Journal of Management Reviews, vol. 9, no. 4, p. 347-373. DOI:

Sweeney, L. 2007. Corporate social responsibility in Ireland: barriers and opportunities experienced by SMEs when undertaking CSR. Corporate Governance, vol. 7, no. 4, p. 516-523. DOI:

Shevchenko, O. V. 2014. Rehulyuvannya polityky korporatyvnoyi sotsialʹnoyi vidpovidalʹnosti: praktyka krayin-chleniv yevropeysʹkoho soyuzu. (Regulation of corporate social responsibility: Practice of the EU countries). Current problems of the internatioanl relations, vol. 122, no. 1, p. 12-21. (In Ukrainian)

Simpson, W. G., Kohers, T. 2002. The Link Between Corporate Social and Financial Performance: Evidence from the Banking Industry. Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 35, no. 2, p. 97-109. DOI:

Sorenson, O., Baum, J. A. C. 2003. Editors’ Introduction: Geography and Strategy: The strategic management of space and place. Geography and Strategy (Advances in Strategic Management). Bingley : Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 20, p. 1-19. DOI:

Story, J., Neves, P. 2015. When corporate social responsibility (CSR) increases performance: exploring the role of intrinsic and extrinsic CSR attribution. Business Ethics: A European Review, vol. 24, no. 2, p. 111-124. DOI:

UKRSTAT. 2018. State Statistics Service of Ukraine, available at:

Van Marrewijk, M. 2003. Concepts and Definitions of CSR and Corporate Sustainability: Between Agency and Communion. Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 44, no. 2-3, p. 95-105. DOI:

Wartick, S. L., Cochran, P. L. 1985. The evolution of the corporate social performance model. Academy of management review, vol. 10, no. 4, p. 758-769. DOI:

Wood, D. J. 1991. Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of management review, vol. 16. no. 4, p. 691-718. DOI:

Yefimenko, T. I., Orlova, M. V., Pyetukhova, T. O. 2014. Podannya pokaznykiv sotsialʹnoyi vidpovidalʹnosti pidpryyemnytstva v finansoviy zvitnosti. (Presentation of indicators of social responsible entrepreneurship in financial reporting. Effective Economics, no. 4. Available at: : (In Ukrainian)

Zinchenko, A., Saprykina, M. 2017. Rozvytok KSV v Ukrayini: 2010–2018 (Corporate social responsibility development in Ukraine: 2010-2018). Kiev, Ukraine : Publishing House Yuston. (In Ukrainian)



How to Cite

Sokil, O., Ubrežiová, I., Eugenio, T., & Marques, T. (2020). Does foodservice industry care about CSR? A study in Portugal and Ukraine. Potravinarstvo Slovak Journal of Food Sciences, 14, 544–553.