Comparison of physicochemical properties of selected locally available legume varieties (mung bean, cowpea and soybean)

Authors

  • Kulasooriyage Tharuka Gunathilake University of Sri Jayewardenepura, Faculty of Applied Science, Department of food Science and Technology, Gangodawila, Nugeoda, Sri Lanka
  • Theja Herath Principal Research Scientist, Industrial Technology Institute (ITI), Food Technology Section, Bauddhaloka Mawatha, Colombo 7, Sri Lanka
  • Jagath Wansapala Head of the Department, University of Sri Jayewardenapura, Faculty of Applied Science, Department of Food Science and Technology, Gangodawila, Nugegoda, Sri Lanka

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5219/631

Keywords:

legume, morphological characteristics, proximate, minerals composition

Abstract

Grain legumes are widely used as high-protein contained crops that play a secondary role to cereal or root crops. In Sri Lanka various legume species are cultivated and often utilised in the whole grain boiled form. The objective of present study was to analyse and compare locally grown legumes varieties; Mung bean (MI 5, MI 6), Cowpea (Bombay, Waruni, Dhawal, MICP1, ANKCP1) and soybean (pb1, MISB1) for their morphological characteristics, proximate and mineral composition (Fe, Ca, Zn, K, P). Seed shape, seed coat texture and colour, seed size and 100 seed weight (g) were observed morphological characteristics in present study. Most of the characteristics of mung bean and soybean were similar within their species whereas characteristics of cowpea varieties largely differed. Values of 100 seed weight among the varieties of mung bean, soybean and cowpea were ranged from 5.8 - 6.5 g, 13.5 - 14.1 g and 13.4 - 17.2 g, respectively. The moisture content of all legume seeds ranged from 6.81% to 11.99%. Results were shown that the protein content significantly higher in soybean (36.56 - 39.70%) followed by mung bean (26.56 - 25.99%) and cowpea (25.22 - 22.84%) respectively. Range of total carbohydrate, crude fat, crude fibre and total ash contents of nine legume varieties varied from 15.29 - 62.97%, 1.25 - 22.02%, 3.04 - 7.93% and 3.43 - 6.35 respectively. potassium (K), phosphorus (P), calcium (Ca), iron (Fe) and zinc (Zn) ranged from 1000 - 1900, 360 - 669, 15.0 - 192.3, 2.26 - 11.6 and 1.67 - 4.26 mg.100g-1 respectively in all the species of studied legume varieties. The wide variation in the chemical and physical properties of observed nine legume varieties, suggesting possible applications for various end-use products.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Akaerue, B., Onwuka, G. 2010. Evaluation of the Yeild, Protein Content and Functional Properties of Mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] Protein Isolates as Affected by Processing. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, vol. 9, no. 8, p. 728-735. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjn.2010.728.735 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/pjn.2010.728.735

Amiruzzaman, M. 2003. Report of the APO Seminar on Processing and utilisation of legumes. [online] s.a. [cit.2016-04-22] Available at: http://www.apo-tokyo.org/00e-books/AG.

Blessing, I. A., Gregory, I. O. 2010. Effect of Processing on the Proximate Composition of the Dehulled and Undehulled Mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] Flours. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, vol. 9, no. 10, p.1006-1016. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjn.2010.1006.1016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/pjn.2010.1006.1016

Butt, M., Batool, R. 2010. Nutritional and Functional Properties of Some Promising Legumes Protein Isolates. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, vol. 9, no. 4, p. 373-379. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjn.2010.373.379 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/pjn.2010.373.379

Cheftel, J., Cuq, J., Lorient, D. 1985. Protéines alimentaires : biochimie, propriétés fonctionnelles, valeur nutritionnelle, modifications chimiques. Paris : Tec & Doc Lavoisier. ISBN: 2-85206-870-2.

Elias, L. G., Colindres, R., Bressani, R. 1964. Nutritive value of eight varieties of cowpea (Vigna sinensis). Journal of Food Science, vol. 29, no. 1, p. 118-122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1964.tb01705.x

Eskin, N. A. M., Shahidi, F. 2012. Biochemistry of Foods. Academic Press, p. 584. ISBN: 978-0122423529.

Genovese, M. I., Lajolo, F. M. 2001. Trypsin inhibitory activity of the bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.): evaluation of critical method of the determinacy. Archivos Latinoamericanos de Nutrición, vol. 51, no. 4, p. 386-394. PMID: 12012566

Gottschalk, W., Müller, H. 1983. Seed proteins. Netherlands : Springer, p. 531. ISBN:978-90-247-2789-6. http://www.springer.com/in/book/9789024727896

Hedley, C. 2000. Carbohydrates in grain legume seeds. UK : John Innes Centre, p. 11-13. ISBN: 0851994679. https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851994673.0000 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851994673.0000

Henshaw, F. 2008. Varietal Differences in Physical Characteristics and Proximate Composition of Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata). World Journal of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 4, no. 3, p. 302-306.

Hettiarachchi, M. P., De Costa, W. A. J. M., Jayasekara, S. J. B. A. 1998. Factors responsible for productivity of food legumes: Finding of a farmer survey in the Kurunegala district, Sri lanka. Tropical Agricultural Reasearch and Extension, vol. 1, no. 2, p. 165-168.

Iqbal, A., Khalil, I., Ateeq, N., Sayyar Khan, M. 2006. Nutritional quality of important food legumes. Food Chemistry, vol. 97, no. 2, p. 331-335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.05.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.05.011

Joshi, A., Liu, C., Sathe, S. 2015. Functional properties of select seed flours. LWT - Food Science and Technology, vol. 60, no. 1, p. 325-331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2014.08.038 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2014.08.038

Kadam, S. S., Deshpande, S., Jambhale, N. 1989. Handbook of world food legumes: Nutritional Chemistry, Processsing Technology, and Utilization, Boca Raton: CRC press, vol. 1, p. 23-50.

Khalid, I. I., Elharadallou, S. B. I. 2013. Functional properties of Cowpea (Vigna Ungiculata L.Walp), and lupin (Lupinus termis) flour and protein isolates. Journal of Nutrition and Food Science, vol. 03, no. 06, p. 1-6. https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-9600.1000234 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-9600.1000234

Kurien, P. P. 1977. Grain Legume Milling Technology. In FAO Expert Consultation on Grain Legume Processing, Mysore, India : CFTRI, pp. 31.

McGreevy, T. 2008. General Properties of Dry Peas, Lentils and Chickpeas. [online] s.a. [cit.2016-04-22] Available at: http://www.pealentil.com/core/files/pealentil/uploads/files/Chapter2.pdf.

Mubarak, A. E., 2005. Nutritional composition and antinutritional factors of mung bean seeds (Phaseolus aureus) as affected by some home traditional processes. Food Chemistry, vol. 9, no. 4, p. 489-495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.01.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.01.007

Mwasaru, M., Muhammad, K., Bakar, J., Man, Y. 1999. Effects of isolation technique and conditions on the extractability, physicochemical and functional properties of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) protein isolates. I. Physicochemical properties. Food Chemistry, vol. 67, no. 4, p. 435-443. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(99)00150-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(99)00150-8

Namiki, M. 1995. The chemistry and physiological functions of sesame. Food Reviews International, vol. 11, no. 2, p. 281-329. https://doi.org/10.1080/87559129509541043 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/87559129509541043

Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC INTERNATIONAL. 2012. 18th ed. USA: Gaithersburg, Md.

Qayyum, M. M. N., Butt, M. S., Anjum, F. M., Nawaz, H. 2012. Composition analysis of some selected legumes for protein isolates recovery. The Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, vol. 22, no. 4, p. 1156-1162. http://www.thejaps.org.pk/docs/V-22-4/55.pdf

Sefa-Dedeh, S., Stanley, D., Voisey, P. 1978. Effects of soaking time and cooking conditions on texture and microstructure of cowpeas (Vigna unguiculata). Journal of Food Science, vol. 43, no. 6, p. 1832-1838. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1978.tb07426.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1978.tb07426.x

Singh, Jai, Verma, P. 1995. Status of Pulse Milling in India. Ludhiana : Central Institute of Post Harvest Engineering and Technology (CIPHET). 22 p.

Singh, S., Singh, H. O., Sikka, K. C. 1968. Distribution of nutrients in anatomical parts of common Indian pulses. Cereal Chemistry, vol. 45, p. 13-18. http://www.aaccnet.org/publications/cc/backissues/1968/Documents/chem45_13.pdf

Sompong, R., Siebenhandl-Ehn, S., Linsberger-Martin, G., Berghofer, E. 2011. Physicochemical and antioxidative properties of red and black rice varieties from Thailand, China and Sri Lanka. Food Chemistry, vol. 124, no. 1, p. 132-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.05.115 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.05.115

Tharanathan, R., Mahadevamma, S. 2003. Grain legumes a boon to human nutrition. Trends in Food Science and Technology, vol. 14, no. 12, p. 507-518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2003.07.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2003.07.002

Timoracká, M., Vollmannová, A., Bystrická, J. 2010. Polyphenols in chosen species of legume - A Review. Potravinarstvo, vol. 4, no. 4, p. 65-72. https://doi.org/10.5219/81 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5219/81

Timoracká, M., Vollmannová, A., Ismael, D. 2011. Minerals, trace elements and flavonoids content in white and coloured kidney bean. Potravinarstvo, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 56-60. https://doi.org/10.5219/116 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5219/116

Uebersax, M. A., Occena, L. G. 1991. Composition and nutritive value of dry edible beans: commercial and the world food relief applications. Michigan Dry Bean Digest, vol. 15, no. 5, p. 3-12.

Wasala, S., Fernando, W. and Narasinghe, I. 2011. Hardseededness of Local Mungbean (Vigna radiata) Varieties. Tropical Agricultural Research and Extension, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 5-6. https://doi.org/10.4038/tare.v14i1.4833 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4038/tare.v14i1.4833

Downloads

Published

2016-09-19

How to Cite

Gunathilake, K. T., Herath, T. ., & Wansapala, J. . (2016). Comparison of physicochemical properties of selected locally available legume varieties (mung bean, cowpea and soybean). Potravinarstvo Slovak Journal of Food Sciences, 10(1), 424–430. https://doi.org/10.5219/631