<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<article xml:lang="en" article-type="research-article" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
    <front>
        <journal-meta>
            <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">PSJFS</journal-id>
            <journal-title-group>
                <journal-title>Potravinarstvo Slovak Journal of Food Sciences</journal-title>
                <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Potr. S. J. F. Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
            </journal-title-group>
            <issn pub-type="ppub">1338-0230</issn>
            <issn pub-type="epub">1337-0960</issn>
            <publisher>
                <publisher-name>Association HACCP Consulting</publisher-name>
            </publisher>
        </journal-meta>
        <article-meta>
            <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">PSJFS-14-1-1075</article-id>
            <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5219/1469</article-id>
            <article-categories>
                <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
                    <subject>ARTICLE</subject>
                </subj-group>
            </article-categories>
            <title-group>
                <article-title>PHYSIOLOGICAL STATE OF PLANTS AND QUALITY OF PLUM FRUITS GRAFTED ON THE ROOTSTOCKS OF VARIOUS STRENGTH OF GROWTH DEPENDING ON THE PLANT NUTRITION MODE</article-title>
            </title-group>
            <contrib-group>
                <contrib contrib-type="author">
                    <name>
                        <surname>Popova</surname>
                        <given-names>Valentina</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1" />
                </contrib>
                <contrib contrib-type="author">
                    <name>
                        <surname>Sergeeva</surname>
                        <given-names>Natalya</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2" />
                </contrib>
                <contrib contrib-type="author">
                    <name>
                        <surname>Yaroshenko</surname>
                        <given-names>Olesya</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1">&#x002A;</xref>
                </contrib>
                <contrib contrib-type="author">
                    <name>
                        <surname>Kuznetsova</surname>
                        <given-names>Anna</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4" />
                </contrib>
                <aff id="aff1">
                    <institution>Valentina Popova, Dr. Agric. Sci., Federal State Budget Scientific Institution "North Caucasian Federal Scientific Center of Horticulture, Viticulture, Wine-making", 40th anniversary of Victory Street, 39, Krasnodar, Russia, 350901, Tel. +79094522631, E-mail: plod@bk.ru</institution>
                </aff>
                <aff id="aff2">
                    <institution>Natalya Sergeeva, Cand. Agr. Sci., Federal State Budget Scientific Institution "North Caucasian Federal Scientific Center of Horticulture, Viticulture, Wine-making", 40th anniversary of Victory Street, 39, Krasnodar, Russia, 350901, Tel. +79034570700, E-mail: sady63@bk.ru</institution>
                </aff>
                <aff id="aff4">
                    <institution>Anna Kuznetsova, Cand. Biol. Sci. Federal State Budget Scientific Institution "North Caucasian Federal Scientific Center of Horticulture, Viticulture, Wine-making", 40th anniversary of Victory Street, 39, Krasnodar, Russia, 350901, Tel. +79002701785, E-mail: anpalkuz@mail.ru</institution>
                </aff>
            </contrib-group>
            <author-notes>
                <corresp id="cor1">
                    <label>&#x002A;</label>
                    <email xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="Olesya-yaroshenko@yandex.ru">Olesya-yaroshenko@yandex.ru</email>
                </corresp>
            </author-notes>
            <pub-date pub-type="epub">
                <day>28</day>
                <month>11</month>
                <year>2020</year>
            </pub-date>
            <pub-date pub-type="ppub">
                <month>11</month>
                <year>2020</year>
            </pub-date>
            <volume>14</volume>
            <issue>1</issue>
            <fpage>1075</fpage>
            <lpage>1087</lpage>
            <history>
                <date date-type="received">
                    <day>22</day>
                    <month>9</month>
                    <year>2020</year>
                </date>
                <date date-type="accepted">
                    <day>15</day>
                    <month>11</month>
                    <year>2020</year>
                </date>
            </history>
            <permissions>
                <copyright-statement>&#x00A9; Association HACCP Consulting. All rights reserved.</copyright-statement>
                <copyright-year>2020</copyright-year>
                <license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/">
                    <license-p>This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (<uri xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0</uri>) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</license-p>
                </license>
            </permissions>
            <abstract>
                <p>The influence of the nutrition mode on the physiological state, productivity, and quality of the plum harvest of the Stanley variety on the rootstocks of various strengths of growth was investigated. The fertilizer system included the intra-soil application of the complex organic-mineral fertilizer based on peat and non-root dressings combined with the “Novosil” phytoregulator. The nutrition mode of plum plants was studied by the method of gross content diagnostics of elements in leaves and fruits. The significant increase of nitrogen and phosphorus content, number of functional pigments, free amino acids, and protein synthesis, especially in plants on the rootstock Best, was established during the period of the intensive shoot and ovary growth. In the early summer, the increase of calcium content and decrease of secondary metabolite one was found against the background of a decline of growth activity in plum leaves on the dwarf and medium rootstocks. The statistically reliable positive correlation between nitrogen, potassium, calcium and their content in plum fruits on the rootstock VVA 1 (r = 0.68, r = 0.74, r = 0.52) and rootstock Best (r = 0.75, r = 0.84, r = 0.61) was identified against the background of the application of fertilizers during the period of stress influence of abiotic factors in July. The green pigment content was also increased. The decline of protein content in leaves in the trees on the rootstock Best and rootstock PK SK 1 was minimal. At that time maximum losses of shared water were in plants on the rootstock cherry plum seedlings and minimum ones were on the rootstock PK SK 1. In early August the gross content of nitrogen, potassium, and calcium in the leaves of shoots increased with the application of fertilizers. In early September the excess of the sum of amino acids in plum leaves was 26,6-30,8% while the one in plum fruits was 12.5 and 23.5%; 24.2 and 11.5%; 17.3 and 19.6% on the rootstock VVA 1, rootstock Best, rootstock PK SK 1 respectively. The nutrition mode optimization promoted increasing of plant productivity on the rootstock Best and fruit weight on the rootstock VVA 1, rootstock Best, and rootstock PK SK 1.</p>
                <p>
                    <bold>Keywords:</bold>
                    <italic>Prunus domestica</italic> plum; rootstocks; plant nutrition mode; physiological state; productivity</p>
            </abstract>
        </article-meta>
    </front>
    <body>
        <sec sec-type="intro">
            <title>INTRODUCTION</title>
            <p>Growing mainly on the rootstock cherry plum seedlings, <italic>Prunus domestica</italic> plum is widespread in industrial plantings of stonecrops of Krasnodar territory located in the west part of Caucasus and Ciscaucasia. The popularity of this culture is related to the precocity and the stable yield (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b8">Eremin et al, 2000;</xref> Eremin, Prichko, Kekhaev, 2007; Eremin et al, 2010; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b10">Eremin and Brizhinov, 2011</xref>). The specific humid climate conditions are necessary for the successful growth and development of plum plants because the water holding capacity of tree bark and wood is unsatisfactory (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b30">Mileti&#x107; et al, 2007</xref>). The coefficient of water consumption to make a unit of tree mass dry matter and harvest is high, therefore, sufficient air humidity is necessary during the period of flowering and growth of shoots (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b12">Gnezdilova and Doroshenko, 1984;</xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b7">Eremin, 2000;</xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b2">Bogdanov, 2003</xref>). The area is characterized by the diversity of soil and climate conditions: from temperate continental to subtropical one. There are also almost all main soils of the temperate zone that are suitable for intensive cultivation of the fruit growing industry there. Chernozem, forest, and meadow soils are the most common – Anthrosols (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b19">IUSS Working Group WRB. 2014</xref>). The species composition of chernozems varies significantly changing from North to South. The main differences are in the organic matter content and the power of the humus layer, mechanical composition, soil compaction, presence of signs of salinity. Various degrees of erosion processes, the waterlogging in winter, and the formatting of verkhovodka (superficial water) are typical for foothills soils (grocerie agroseme texture-differentiated and agronomy structural-metamorphic) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b43">Shishov L. L et al, 2004</xref>). Alluvial agrohumus hydrometamorphic soils with small power of humus layer and a wide range of nutrition elements stock that are available for plants are prevalent in the river valleys (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b44">Simakin, 1969;</xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b32">Negovelov et al, 1985;</xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b6">Eisert, Achkanov, Durgaryan, 1987;</xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b26">Lipchiu and Gagai 2014</xref>). At the same time, the main limiting factors which interfere with the realization of the productive potential of plum are the precipitation deficit in spring and summer against the background of intensive solar insolation and the physical and chemical properties of soil. The search of special technological methods and the selection of varietyrootstocks combinations and planting structures with compact bark that keep the plum plant resistance and the formatting of economically valuable signs of fruit quality are relevant due to the regional features of soil and climate conditions (Sergeeva, Kuznetsova, Nenko, 2015; Sergeeva, Kuznetsova, Kovalenko, 2016).</p>
            <p>Early studies have identified the nutrition mode features and the yield of <italic>Prunus domestica</italic> plum of varieties zoned in the region on the rootstock cherry plum seedlings. The field experiments were systematic and long-lasting which allowed us to draw a conclusion about the positive effect of regular application of mineral fertilizers on the reproductive function of the crop (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b42">Sergeeva and Yatsenko, 1999</xref>). Further research in this area (2014 – 2017) is linked with the intensification of production, the problem of rational selection varieties and rootstocks of <italic>Prunus domestica</italic> plum – components that help stabilize productivity of trees in various soil and climate area conditions for new industrial plantings (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b22">Kuznetsova et al, 2011;</xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b23">Kuznetsova and Romanenko, 2014</xref>).</p>
            <sec>
                <title>Scientific hypothesis</title>
                <p>After analysis of dynamics of <italic>Prunus domestica</italic> plum plant productivity in the plantings of various structures and level of agricultural equipment in chernozem leached of the central zone of Krasnodar territory the working hypothesis about the regulation function of rootstock depending on the mineral nutrition mode of the crop that contributes to the formatting of physiological resistance to the negative impact of abiotic factors repeated in summer annually was ventured. That served as the basis for conducting experimental research in production conditions of influence of the systemic application of fertilizers on the functional state, productivity, and quality of plum fruits of the Stanley variety that is quite demanding to the soil and climate conditions on the rootstocks of various strength of growth.</p>
            </sec>
        </sec>
        <sec sec-type="materials|methods">
            <title>MATERIAL AND METHODOLOGY</title>
            <p>The object of research 2014 – 2017 is <italic>Prunus domestica</italic> plum plants of Stanley variety on the clonal rootstocks of various strength of growth: VVA 1, Best, PK SK 1, Pixy and cherry plum seedlings (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1</xref>).</p>
            <fig id="F1" position="float">
                <label>Figure 1</label>
                <caption>
                    <p>Experienced <italic>Prunus domestica</italic> plum Stanley variety on the rootstocks.</p>
                    <p>Note: А – <italic>VVA 1</italic>, cross Microcerarus tomentosa (<italic>Thunb</italic>) <italic>Erem. et Yushev</italic>) х (<italic>P.cerasifera Ehrh</italic>.); <italic>В – Best</italic>, <italic>Prunus pumila L. х Prunus cerasifera Enrh</italic>; <italic>C – PK SK 1</italic>, cross of hybridization <italic>Microcerasus pumila L. x Prunus cerasifera Ehrh</italic>; F – <italic>Pixy</italic>, nursling <italic>Prunus domestica subsp. Insititia (L.)</italic>; G –<italic>cherry plum seedlings (Prunus cerasifera Ehrh)</italic>.</p>
                </caption>
                <graphic xlink:href="PSJFS-14-1-1075_F1.jpg"/>
            </fig>
            <p>Rootstock characteristics: <italic>VVA 1</italic> is the frost-resistant, but unstable to drought rootstock of domestic selection. Plum trees come into the fruiting quickly and have a crown 50% less than ones on cherry plum seedlings.</p>
            <p>
                <italic>Best</italic> is the winter-hardy resistant to high temperatures medium rootstock. It has a positive influence on the precocity and the productivity of grafted trees which have an average drought tolerance.</p>
            <p>
                <italic>PK SK 1</italic> is the frost-resistant and drought-tolerant, resistant to bacterial cancer medium rootstock of domestic selection that has high productivity of the mother plants and plum trees on it.</p>
            <p>
                <italic>Pixy</italic> – the easily propagated semi-dwarf rootstock of English selection that has a positive influence on the productivity and the plum tree crown compactness and gives a lot of growth in the garden. Besides, its tolerance to drought and frost-resistance is mediocre. The disadvantages of this rootstock as all seed ones are the late entry of plum trees to fruiting, the low percentage of rootstock yield from winter with low negative temperatures, and the difficulty of use in intensive gardening.</p>
            <p>
                <italic>Cherry plum seedlings</italic> – the high rootstock that is high adaptative to the wide range of stress factors affecting the South of Russia. Its compatibility with all known varieties of plum is the cause of prolonged use in the North Caucasus.</p>
            <p>The material for the study was obtained in industrial plantings of <italic>Prunus domestica</italic> plum of the close corporation &#x201C;Plodovod&#x201D; (Krasnodar) planted in 2006. Geographically, the experimental site is located in the central plains of the Krasnodar Territory. Height above sea level varies from 19 to 32 m. The climate is temperate-continental. The layout of plants is 5 х 2 m. The trees are cultivated without any support. The system for crown formatting of plum trees is spindle-shaped ensuring the greatest productivity of the variety in thickened plantings, according to several authors (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b37">Raki&#x107;evi&#x107; et al, 2007</xref>). The forming complex pruning was carried out in the late spring on the formed ovary of fruits. Performing corrective cropping in July allowed plants to save a full ovary and realize the generative function as much as possible. The equilibrium balanced crown with fruit buds that were formed in the last summer-early autumn and had a high winter and frost resistance was created by the subsequent removal of growth points from the vegetative shoots, the thinning, and the lightening of thickened parts. The annual spring inspection of the freezing of flower buds in trees of various growth strength showed no damage from the return of cold weather and the killing frosts after the beginning of flowering. The blooming score was 4,8-5,0 in all versions of the experiment annually.</p>
            <p>The soil of the experimental plot is the agrosem clayilluvial low-humus heavy-duty (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b43">Shishov L. L et al, 2004</xref>). The plot is aligned according to the terrain and the value of agrochemical indicators of the soil. The agrochemical study of its soil and plants was conducted using common methods and GOST standards of chemical diagnostics (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b13">GOST standards 26204-91;</xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b14">26213-91;</xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b15">26951-86;</xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b48">Voskresenskaya, 2006;</xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b50">Yaroshenko and Sergeeva, 2020</xref>). The complex organic-mineral chlorine-free fertilizer based on peat (Organic Mineral Fertilizer from Russian abbreviation: ОМУ) was applied at a dose of 5.0 t. ha<sup>-1</sup> in the garden soil in the middles at the distance 1 – 1.2 m from the trunk of the tree in optimal agrotechnical times. The effect of Organic Mineral Fertilizer was prolonged due to the content of organic-mineral complexes with humic compounds allowing to fix nitrogen and potassium in the exchange form and decrease their mobility in the soil. The phosphorus in fertilizer was presented in a form digested easily by plants. The fertilizer was granular with a mass fraction of nitrogen (in ammonium form) of 7.0%, total phosphorus (P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>) of 7.0%, potassium (К<sub>2</sub>О) of 8.2%, humic compounds of 2.5%. The non-root dressings of 0,5% solutions of special complex mineral fertilizers were applied in combination with biologically active agents thrice during the vegetative period. The fertilizers of N18P18K18Mg1S1.5 and N12P12K35Mg2S0.7 brands were used. They included Fe, Cu, Zn, Mn, B, Mo trace elements in chelated form. The non-root cultivation with fertilizer water solutions was conducted by means of the knapsack sprayer. The version with no Organic Mineral Fertilizer application and trees spraying with no addition of any fertilizers was controlled. There were 6 accounting trees in the control and experimental version. The tests were performed in four replications. The total area of the research site – 2 ga.</p>
            <p>Laboratory tests of plants&#x27; physiological state (determining amino acids) were conducted on three analytical surfaces according to the recommended methods (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b33">Nenko et al, 2015</xref>). The chlorophyll (а+b) content in the leaves was determined in dynamics using the spectral method on the spectrophotometer Unico 2800 (&#x201C;United Products &#x26; Instruments&#x201D;, USA). The water content in leaves was analyzed by the weight method according to the M.D. Kushnirenko technique (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b21">Kushnirenko, 1986</xref>). The elemental composition plants were conducted using common methods (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b48">Voskresenskaya, 2006</xref>).</p>
            <p>The metrological observations allowed us to evaluate the degree of the negative impact of abiotic factors in the summer and establish the beginning of the stressful situation for plum plants during the study.</p>
            <p>Agrobiology accounting was carried out according to the recommended methods (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b39">Sedov and Ogoltsova, 1999</xref>).</p>
            <sec>
                <title>Statistical analysis</title>
                <p>The statistical analysis was performed in accordance with the recommended method (Volkov, 2005). Calculations were performed using a software package Microsoft Office 2010 (&#x201C;Microsoft, Inc.&#x201D;, USA). The <italic>p</italic>-value was used (<italic>p &#x3C;0.05</italic>) for checking the null hypothesis to quantify the idea of statistical significance.</p>
            </sec>
        </sec>
        <sec sec-type="results|discussion">
            <title>RESULTS AND DISCUSSION</title>
            <p>The agrochemical indicators of the plot soil were explored before laying the experiment. The humus content of the topsoil varied between 3.05 – 3.17% (LSD (<italic>p</italic> &#x2264;0.05) = 0.14), the mobile phosphorus one – between 243 – 252 mg.kg<sup>-1</sup> (LSD (p &#x2264;0.05) = 7.70), the exchangeable potassium content – between 217 – 221 mg. kg<sup>-1</sup> (LSD (p ≤005) = 3.42). The content of the nitrate form of nitrogen in the soil layer 0-60 sm did not exceed 0.7 – 1.2 mg. kg<sup>-1</sup> The chemical analysis showed a significant increase of the mineral elements forms available for plants one year after the application of mineral fertilizers. The mobile phosphorous content was 286 – 308 mg. kg<sup>-1</sup>, the exchangeable potassium one was 238 – 245 mg. kg<sup>-1</sup> in the mineral fertilizer application zone.</p>
            <p>The nitrate-nitrogen content in the soil layer 0 – 40 cm increased 3 – 5 times in spring and 97 – 155% in October compared to the control version (without Organic Mineral Fertilizer application). Against that background the first non-root dressing of trees with water solutions of special fertilizers was conducted in the ratio N:Ph:P = 1:1:1. The treatment was repeated 4 – 5 weeks after flowering (the fruit size is up to 3 cm in diameter) during the stone formatting. The third dressing with water solutions of special fertilizers was conducted in the ratio N:Ph:P = 1:1:2 – 2.5 in summer (in the period of differentiation of buds). The phytoregulator &#x201C;Novosil&#x201D; was added in the nutrient solution composition in the ratio at the concentration of 0.02% at each treatment of plants. The changes in the seasonal nutrition mode were checked for the nutrients content in the leaves of growth shoots (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1</xref>).</p>
            <table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
                <label>Table 1</label>
                <caption>
                    <p>Effect of fertilizers on the content of macronutrients in the leaves of plum, the third decade of may (mg.kg<sup>-1</sup>).</p>
                </caption>
                <table frame="hsides" rules="none" width="100%">
                    <thead>
                        <tr>
                            <th>Variation</th>
                            <th>N</th>
                            <th>P</th>
                            <th>K</th>
                            <th>Ca</th>
                            <th>Mg</th>
                        </tr>
                        <tr>
                            <th colspan="6">
                                <hr/>
                            </th>
                        </tr>
                    </thead>
                    <tbody>
                        <tr align="center">
                            <td/>
                            <td colspan="4"><italic>Rootstock VVA 1</italic></td>
                            <td/>
                        </tr>
                        <tr align="center">
                            <td><bold>Control</bold></td>
                            <td>3.08</td>
                            <td>0.34</td>
                            <td>1.72</td>
                            <td>1.01</td>
                            <td>0.35</td>
                        </tr>
                        <tr align="center">
                            <td><bold>OMF+ foliar application</bold></td>
                            <td>3.56</td>
                            <td>0.35</td>
                            <td>1.76</td>
                            <td>1.18</td>
                            <td>0.43</td>
                        </tr>
                        <tr align="center">
                            <td><bold>LSD (<italic>p </italic>&#x2264;0.05)</bold></td>
                            <td>0.24</td>
                            <td>0.05</td>
                            <td>0.07</td>
                            <td>0.13</td>
                            <td>0.06</td>
                        </tr>
                        <tr align="center">
                            <td/>
                            <td colspan="4"><italic>Rootstock Best</italic></td>
                            <td/>
                        </tr>
                        <tr align="center">
                            <td><bold>Control</bold></td>
                            <td>3.16</td>
                            <td>0.33</td>
                            <td>1.54</td>
                            <td>1.26</td>
                            <td>0.58</td>
                        </tr>
                        <tr align="center">
                            <td><bold>OMF+ foliar application</bold></td>
                            <td>3.75</td>
                            <td>0.36</td>
                            <td>1.65</td>
                            <td>1.48</td>
                            <td>0.69</td>
                        </tr>
                        <tr align="center">
                            <td><bold>LSD (<italic>p </italic>&#x2264;0.05)</bold></td>
                            <td>0.10</td>
                            <td>0.03</td>
                            <td>0.07</td>
                            <td>0.11</td>
                            <td>0.09</td>
                        </tr>
                        <tr align="center">
                            <td/>
                            <td colspan="4"><italic>Rootstock PK SK 1</italic></td>
                            <td/>
                        </tr>
                        <tr align="center">
                            <td><bold>Control</bold></td>
                            <td>3.11</td>
                            <td>0.33</td>
                            <td>1.69</td>
                            <td>1.18</td>
                            <td>0.61</td>
                        </tr>
                        <tr align="center">
                            <td><bold>OMF+ foliar application</bold></td>
                            <td>3.45</td>
                            <td>0.35</td>
                            <td>1.72</td>
                            <td>1.23</td>
                            <td>0.64</td>
                        </tr>
                        <tr align="center">
                            <td><bold>LSD (<italic>p </italic>&#x2264;0.05)</bold></td>
                            <td>0.15</td>
                            <td>0.04</td>
                            <td>0.03</td>
                            <td>0.17</td>
                            <td>0.08</td>
                        </tr>
                        <tr align="center">
                            <td/>
                            <td colspan="4"><italic>Rootstock Pixy</italic></td>
                            <td/>
                        </tr>
                        <tr align="center">
                            <td><bold>Control</bold></td>
                            <td>3.19</td>
                            <td>0.33</td>
                            <td>1.66</td>
                            <td>1.51</td>
                            <td>0.44</td>
                        </tr>
                        <tr align="center">
                            <td><bold>OMF+ foliar application</bold></td>
                            <td>3.61</td>
                            <td>0.36</td>
                            <td>1.73</td>
                            <td>1.49</td>
                            <td>0.43</td>
                        </tr>
                        <tr align="center">
                            <td><bold>LSD (<italic>p </italic>&#x2264;0.05)</bold></td>
                            <td>0.13</td>
                            <td>0.02</td>
                            <td>0.05</td>
                            <td>0.05</td>
                            <td>0.02</td>
                        </tr>
                        <tr align="center">
                            <td/>
                            <td colspan="4"><italic>Rootstock cherry plum seedlings</italic></td>
                            <td/>
                        </tr>
                        <tr align="center">
                            <td><bold>Control</bold></td>
                            <td>3.42</td>
                            <td>0.34</td>
                            <td>1.97</td>
                            <td>1.68</td>
                            <td>0.50</td>
                        </tr>
                        <tr align="center">
                            <td><bold>OMF+ foliar application</bold></td>
                            <td>3.69</td>
                            <td>0.35</td>
                            <td>1.95</td>
                            <td>1.71</td>
                            <td>0.56</td>
                        </tr>
                        <tr align="center">
                            <td><bold>LSD (<italic>p </italic>&#x2264;0.05)</bold></td>
                            <td>0.14</td>
                            <td>0.03</td>
                            <td>0.07</td>
                            <td>0.04</td>
                            <td>0.07</td>
                        </tr>
                    </tbody>
                </table>
            </table-wrap>
            <p>Annual systematic application of fertilizers by nonroot method during the period of the intensive shoot and ovary growth (in spring) promoted increasing of the total content of nutrients in plum leaves on the rootstocks of various strength of growth. The resulting effect was also noted by several authors who have studied the influence of fertilizers on the plum nutrition mode (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b29">Mileti&#x107;, et al, 2003;</xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b11">Fatma et al, 2018</xref>).</p>
            <p>The significant increase was detected mainly in the nitrogen and potassium content. However, the increase in potassium content was not always confirmed statistically. Besides, the reliable increase of potassium and magnesium content was noted in the plum on the <italic>VVA 1</italic> dwarf rootstock during that period.</p>
            <p>The changes in the plum nutrition mode promoted activation of physiological processes. This corresponds to the data from literature sources reporting about the positive impact of fertilizers on the stone fruit crops (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b49">Wan Yi-zhen, Sheng Bo-biao, Du Hui-fang, 2003;</xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b29">Miletic et al, 2003;</xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b3">Cuque et al, 2011;</xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b31">Milosevic and Milocevic, 2012;</xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b5">Doroshenko, Riazanova, Maksimtsov, 2015;</xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b11">Fatma et al, 2018</xref>). The increase of several functional pigments (Сhla+Сhlb) in the plum leaves on rootstocks of various strength of growth was identified by the spectral analysis method in the application of fertilizers. The most significant increase of a number of the main photosynthetic pigment (Сhla), an energy donor, was discovered in the leaves of plum on the rootstock <italic>Best</italic>. The high content of the chlorophyll b (Сhlb), the activator of the biosynthetic processes, was occurred in the same version annually. The total chlorophyll content (Сhla+Сhlb) in the leaves exceeded stably the value in the control version by 20.1- 25.4% in trees on the rootstock <italic>PK SK 1</italic>, <italic>rootstock Pixy</italic>, and rootstock <italic>cherry plum seedlings</italic>. At the same time, the lamina area of trees on those rootstocks exceeded the values in the control version by 12.7%, 7.4, and 9.1% respectively. The tendency to increase the nutrient content in the plum leaves against the background of the application of fertilizers revealed mainly in the years with the sufficient water availability on the <italic>VVA 1</italic> dwarf rootstock that had the surface occurrence of the main part of the root system (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2</xref>).</p>
            <fig id="F2" position="float">
                <label>Figure 2</label>
                <caption>
                    <p>The content of functional pigment in plum leaves in relation to the fertilizers and variety-rootstock. combinations.</p>
                </caption>
                <graphic xlink:href="PSJFS-14-1-1075_F2.jpg"/>
            </fig>
            <p>The increase of the intensity of metabolic processes that was probably associated with the activity of photosynthesis and synthetic activity of the root system was confirmed by the analysis of the free amino acid content in the leaves using the method of capillary electrophoresis.</p>
            <p>The tendency of the predominant increase of arginine in shoot leaves was detected annually during the period of the activity of growth processes in spring when the maximum temperature was up to 28 – 32 &#xBA;С and the precipitation fell periodically. The changes in the nutrition mode promoted increasing of the arginine amount in leaves by 42.3% (<italic>Rootstock Best</italic>), 37.4% (<italic>Rootstock PK SK 1</italic>), 29.6% (<italic>Rootstock Pixi</italic>), 12.7% (<italic>Rootstock VVА 1</italic>), and 27.9% (<italic>Rootstock cherry plum seedlings</italic>) at that stage of seasonal plant development. More active protein synthesis was occurred in leaves on the rootstock <italic>Best</italic> in spring and summer annually. Its content was higher by 8-10% compared to the one in the control version (with no fertilizers). Further, the recorded annual increase in air temperature to maximum values of 30 – 35 &#xBA;С and the prolonged lack of precipitation promoted increasing of the amino acid Proline content in the leaves. Its content in leaves was 46.4% (<italic>Rootstock PK SK 1</italic>), 39.8% (<italic>Rootstock Pixi</italic>), 32.5% (<italic>Rootstock VVА 1</italic>), 26.2% (<italic>Rootstock cherry plum seedlings</italic>), and more than 80% (<italic>Rootstock Best</italic>) higher in the version with the application of fertilizers. The identified tendency was confirmed by our researches on other fruit crops (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b35">Popova, Yaroshenko, Sergeeva, 2018</xref>).</p>
            <p>The nutrition mode of culture changed by the end of the second decade of June against the background of the growth activity decrease of trees. The total nitrogen and phosphorous content in all versions of experiment was 2.22 – 2.24 and 0.163 – 0.168% respectively. The potassium content went up to 2.12% (<italic>Rootstock VVА 1</italic>) and 2.61 – 2.68% (<italic>Rootstock Best, Rootstock PK SK1, Rootstock Pixi, Rootstock cherry plum seedlings</italic>). Calcium in the leaves of dwarf and medium trees went up to 1.59% (<italic>Rootstock VVА 1</italic>) and 1.70% respectively. There were no changes in the plum on the rootstock <italic>cherry plum seedlings</italic>. The total magnesium content changed insignificantly. The secondary metabolite content in the plum shoot leaves decreased on the rootstocks of various strength of growth. That was probably caused by an outflow of assimilates into the growing fruits. The total number of amino acids was no more than 60.2 -89.6% of the previously established content in all versions of the experiment. In June the accountings for the degree of ovary reduction on the accounting trees showed the advantage of the version with the application of fertilizers: a number of the fully preserved ovary was higher by 12.3 – 33.7% depending on the rootstock (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3</xref>).</p>
            <fig id="F3" position="float">
                <label>Figure 3</label>
                <caption>
                    <p>The excess of the number of preserved ovaries in plum plants against the background of application of fertilizers in relation to the control version (with no fertilizers) (the third decade of June),% (2014 – 2017).</p>
                </caption>
                <graphic xlink:href="PSJFS-14-1-1075_F3.jpg"/>
            </fig>
            <p>The visual analysis and the calculation of the ovary in the control version allowed us to conclude that without the application of fertilizers, the percentage of deformed fruits, that is associated, according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b40">Semenov (2007)</xref>, with the negative abiotic factors impact, is higher significantly and ranges from 3.3 to 8.7% depending on the variety-rootstock combination. The most common characteristics of ovary deformity are represented in Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">4</xref>.</p>
            <fig id="F4" position="float">
                <label>Figure 4</label>
                <caption>
                    <p>The most common character deformity of plum ovary development on the example of the Stanley variety on the rootstock <italic>Best</italic> (2014 – 2017).</p>
                </caption>
                <graphic xlink:href="PSJFS-14-1-1075_F4.jpg"/>
            </fig>
            <p>In July the stage of development of generative buds of plum of Stanley variety in the sinuses of side leaves of shoots was diagnosed by the method of microscopy. In the same period, the analysis of the chemical content of growing fruits was conducted with leaf diagnostics. The most significant difference between the versions was identified on the rootstock <italic>VVA1</italic> and rootstock <italic>Best</italic> (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5</xref>). The closest correlation between the nitrogen, potassium, and calcium content in leaves and fruits was determined. The correlation coefficient was 0.68, 0.74, 0.52 (<italic>Rootstock VVА 1</italic>) and 0.75, 0.84, 0.61 (<italic>Rootstock Best</italic>) respectively.</p>
            <fig id="F5" position="float">
                <label>Figure 5</label>
                <caption>
                    <p>The chemical content of growing fruits in July (2014 – 2017).</p>
                </caption>
                <graphic xlink:href="PSJFS-14-1-1075_F5.jpg"/>
            </fig>
            <p>The correlation analysis showed a less close relationship that did not exceed the values of 0.55 – 0.64. Several scientists (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b34">Plich, W&#xF3;jcik, 2002;</xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b11">Fatma et al, 2018</xref>) pointed to changes in the quality of plum fruits and the increase of calcium content in them against the background of the application of non-root dressings.</p>
            <p>The summer and early autumn experimental studies were accompanied by the annual accounting and the analysis of metadata because many authors pointed to the strong influence of the water stress factor on the intensity of plum growth processes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b17">Li Wen-hua et al, 2003</xref>). It is necessary to note that the longest stress situations related to hyperthermia, the lack of precipitation, and the decrease of air humidity up to 12 – 14% was observed from the second decade of July to mid-September. The data of the functional state of <italic>Prunus domestica</italic> plum plants on the rootstocks of various strength of growth was the most informative and allowing to evaluate the effectiveness of fertilizers under these conditions.</p>
            <p>Conducted research on green pigment content in leaves identified the seasonal decrease of plant photosynthetic activity. At the same time, despite the negative effect of physical factors the level of green pigment content in plum shoot leaves was higher significantly against the background of the application of fertilizers than one in the control version. It is possibly related to the action of the phytoregulator used as a part of the nutrient solution for non-root dressings and increased the plant protective features. That fact was also pointed by in their study (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b45">Upadysheva, Upadyshev, 2012</xref>) (Table 2). The difference between the experimental versions was also identified by protein content in plum leaves. The seasonal decrease of protein in shoot leaves an average of 20-24% compared to the spring and the summer period was observed in all versions of the experiment. However, when the fertilizers were applied the decrease of protein amount in leaves of plum on the rootstock <italic>Best</italic> and rootstock <italic>PK SK 1</italic> was minimal and amounted to 25.3 and 23.2 mg. kg<sup>-1</sup> of dry matter respectively.</p>
            <p>That fact characterized higher intensity of reparation processes in trees on those rootstocks.</p>
            <p>Under the conditions of the tensity of hydrothermal factors in summer, the water content in leaves was determined depending on the application of fertilizers and the variety-rootstock combinations. Plants on the rootstock cherry plum seedlings had the most significant losses of shared water that was up to 9.3% (Organic Mineral Fertilizer + non-root dressings) and 12.7% (control, with no fertilizers). The minimal water losses were identified in leaves in plum on the rootstock <italic>PK SK 1</italic> that was 5.7 – 8.4% respectively.</p>
            <p>The continuation of diagnostic studies of the functional state of the plum plant was accompanied by morphoanatomical observations of the generative buds in the first decade of August. The beginning of the differentiation of the rudimental sepals was detected in the majority of conducted buds (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">6</xref>).</p>
            <fig id="F6" position="float">
                <label>Figure 6</label>
                <caption>
                    <p>The development of the sepal rudiments in the inflorescence flower (A), the development of the sepal rudiments in the single flower (B) (2014 – 2017).</p>
                </caption>
                <graphic xlink:href="PSJFS-14-1-1075_F6.jpg"/>
            </fig>
            <p>That stage of plum plant development was characterized by the next change of nutrition mode. The gross content of nitrogen, potassium, and calcium increased in shoot leaves. At the same time, the differences between the versions were significant (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">3</xref>).</p>
            <table-wrap id="T3" position="float">
                <label>Table 3</label>
                <caption>
                    <p>Effect of fertilizers on the content of macronutrients in the leaves of <italic>Prunus domestica</italic> plum, early August (mg.kg<sup>-1</sup>).</p>
                </caption>
                <table frame="hsides" rules="none" width="100%">
                    <thead>
                        <tr>
                            <th>Variation</th>
                            <th>N</th>
                            <th>P</th>
                            <th>K</th>
                            <th>Ca</th>
                            <th>Mg</th>
                        </tr>
                        <tr>
                            <th colspan="6">
                                <hr/>
                            </th>
                        </tr>
                    </thead>
                    <tbody>
                        <tr align="center">
                            <td/>
                            <td colspan="4"><italic>Rootstock VVA 1</italic></td>
                            <td/>
                        </tr>
                        <tr align="center">
                            <td><bold>Control</bold></td>
                            <td>2.41</td>
                            <td>0.18</td>
                            <td>1.87</td>
                            <td>2.73</td>
                            <td>0.37</td>
                        </tr>
                        <tr align="center">
                            <td><bold>OMF+ foliar application</bold></td>
                            <td>2.62</td>
                            <td>0.18</td>
                            <td>2.80</td>
                            <td>3.17</td>
                            <td>0.51</td>
                        </tr>
                        <tr align="center">
                            <td><bold>LSD (<italic>p </italic>&#x2264;0.05)</bold></td>
                            <td>0.11</td>
                            <td>0.02</td>
                            <td>0.18</td>
                            <td>0.14</td>
                            <td>0.10</td>
                        </tr>
                        <tr align="center">
                            <td/>
                            <td colspan="4"><italic>Rootstock Best</italic></td>
                            <td/>
                        </tr>
                        <tr align="center">
                            <td><bold>Control</bold></td>
                            <td>2.52</td>
                            <td>0.14</td>
                            <td>2.58</td>
                            <td>3.19</td>
                            <td>0.34</td>
                        </tr>
                        <tr align="center">
                            <td><bold>OMF+ foliar application</bold></td>
                            <td>2.58</td>
                            <td>0.16</td>
                            <td>2.75</td>
                            <td>3.48</td>
                            <td>0.46</td>
                        </tr>
                        <tr align="center">
                            <td><bold>LSD (<italic>p </italic>&#x2264;0.05)</bold></td>
                            <td>0.07</td>
                            <td>0.02</td>
                            <td>0.08</td>
                            <td>0.11</td>
                            <td>0.05</td>
                        </tr>
                        <tr align="center">
                            <td/>
                            <td colspan="4"><italic>Rootstock PK SK 1</italic></td>
                            <td/>
                        </tr>
                        <tr align="center">
                            <td><bold>Control</bold></td>
                            <td>2.64</td>
                            <td>0.16</td>
                            <td>2.32</td>
                            <td>3.12</td>
                            <td>0.38</td>
                        </tr>
                        <tr align="center">
                            <td><bold>OMF+ foliar application</bold></td>
                            <td>2.86</td>
                            <td>0.16</td>
                            <td>2.44</td>
                            <td>3.17</td>
                            <td>0.41</td>
                        </tr>
                        <tr align="center">
                            <td><bold>LSD (<italic>p </italic>&#x2264;0.05)</bold></td>
                            <td>0.09</td>
                            <td>0.01</td>
                            <td>0.07</td>
                            <td>0.10</td>
                            <td>0.05</td>
                        </tr>
                        <tr align="center">
                            <td/>
                            <td colspan="4"><italic>Rootstock Pixy</italic></td>
                            <td/>
                        </tr>
                        <tr align="center">
                            <td><bold>Control</bold></td>
                            <td>2.47</td>
                            <td>0.14</td>
                            <td>2.49</td>
                            <td>3.03</td>
                            <td>0.43</td>
                        </tr>
                        <tr align="center">
                            <td><bold>OMF+ foliar application</bold></td>
                            <td>2.53</td>
                            <td>0.15</td>
                            <td>2.57</td>
                            <td>3.10</td>
                            <td>0.48</td>
                        </tr>
                        <tr align="center">
                            <td><bold>LSD (<italic>p </italic>&#x2264;0.05)</bold></td>
                            <td>0.05</td>
                            <td>0.02</td>
                            <td>0.05</td>
                            <td>0.09</td>
                            <td>0.05</td>
                        </tr>
                        <tr align="center">
                            <td/>
                            <td colspan="4"><italic>Rootstock cherry plum seedlings</italic></td>
                            <td/>
                        </tr>
                        <tr align="center">
                            <td><bold>Control</bold></td>
                            <td>2.73</td>
                            <td>0.20</td>
                            <td>2.48</td>
                            <td>1.85</td>
                            <td>0.34</td>
                        </tr>
                        <tr align="center">
                            <td><bold>OMF+ foliar application</bold></td>
                            <td>3.03</td>
                            <td>0.23</td>
                            <td>2.97</td>
                            <td>2.97</td>
                            <td>0.35</td>
                        </tr>
                        <tr align="center">
                            <td><bold>LSD (<italic>p </italic>&#x2264;0.05)</bold></td>
                            <td>0.13</td>
                            <td>0.02</td>
                            <td>0.19</td>
                            <td>0.23</td>
                            <td>0.06</td>
                        </tr>
                    </tbody>
                </table>
            </table-wrap>
            <p>According to the morphoanatomical research data, the transition to formatting of petals and stamens began in the majority of rudimental flowers of the plum plant by early September. The periodical precipitation promoted growth activity mainly in trees on the medium rootstocks. The gross content of nitrogen, phosphorous, and magnesium increased up to 18.6%, 7.7, and 29.5% respectively regardless of the version of the experiment (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">7</xref>).</p>
            <fig id="F7" position="float">
                <label>Figure 7</label>
                <caption>
                    <p>The nitrogen, phosphorous and magnesium content in shoot leaves of plum of Slanley variety in the stage of forming of the petals and stamens in the rudimental flowers, August-September (2014 – 2017).</p>
                </caption>
                <graphic xlink:href="PSJFS-14-1-1075_F7.jpg"/>
            </fig>
            <p>The most significant increase of amino acid content in leaves was determined in plum plants on the rootstock <italic>Best</italic> in the version with the application of fertilizers against that background. The excess of the sum of amino acids was 26.6 – 30.8% in some years. The correlation coefficient between the nitrogen content in leaves and the total amount of free amino acids was r = 0.56 (Rootstock <italic>VVА 1</italic>), r = 0.67 – 0.71 (Rootstock <italic>PK SK 1</italic>, Rootstock <italic>cherry plum seedlings</italic>), r = 0.81 – 0.83 (Rootstock <italic>Best</italic>).</p>
            <p>The specified period was also the beginning of fruit ripening of plum of Stanley variety (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8">8</xref>), which had an immediate influence on the post-harvest storage of fruits, according to the authors (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b27">Manganaris, Vicente, Crisosto, 2008</xref>).</p>
            <fig id="F8" position="float">
                <label>Figure 8</label>
                <caption>
                    <p>The chemical content of fruits in the ripening period, August-September (2014 – 2017).</p>
                </caption>
                <graphic xlink:href="PSJFS-14-1-1075_F8.jpg"/>
            </fig>
            <p>The significant impact of the fertilizers applying in the experiment on the content of gross forms of potassium and calcium in fruits on the rootstock <italic>VVA 1</italic>, rootstock <italic>Best</italic>, rootstock <italic>PK SK 1</italic> those content exceeded the amount of the element in fruits of the control version by 12.5 and 23.5%; 24.2 and 11.5%; 17.3 and 19.6% respectively.</p>
            <p>The dynamics of plum productivity on the rootstocks of various strength of growth against the background of the application of fertilizers were analyzed depending on the protection area of tree crowns (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">4</xref>). The dimensions of plum tree crowns formed by a spindle-shaped system matched the strength of the growth of the rootstocks. The annual measurement of the protection area of tree crowns in 2014 – 2018 allowed us to establish the highest values in trees on the rootstock <italic>cherry plum seedlings</italic> that were amounted to 3.69 – 3.99 m<sup>2</sup>. The smallest protection area of tree crowns was noted in the trees on the rootstock <italic>VVA 1</italic> that was 2.02 – 2.52 m<sup>2</sup>. The average indicators were determined on the rootstock <italic>Best</italic>, rootstock <italic>PK SK 1</italic>, and rootstock <italic>Pixi</italic> that are 3.07-3.13; 3.53-3.75 and 3.36-3.64 m<sup>2</sup> respectively. The highest stable indicators of plum productivity were identified on the dwarf rootstock <italic>VVA 1</italic> that matched the data of (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b36">Provorchenko et al, 2015</xref>).</p>
            <table-wrap id="T4" position="float">
                <label>Table 4</label>
                <caption>
                    <p>The productivity of plum of Stanley variety depending on the habitus of the crown and the application of fertilizers.</p>
                </caption>
                <table frame="hsides" rules="none" width="100%">
                    <thead>
                        <tr>
                            <th colspan="5">The number of fruits per 1 m<sup>2</sup> of the crown projection area, piece.</th>
                        </tr>
                        <tr>
                            <th colspan="5">
                                <hr/>
                            </th>
                        </tr>
                        <tr>
                            <th>Variation</th>
                            <th>2014</th>
                            <th>2015</th>
                            <th>2016</th>
                            <th>2017</th>
                        </tr>
                        <tr>
                            <th colspan="5">
                                <hr/>
                            </th>
                        </tr>
                    </thead>
                    <tbody>
                        <tr align="center">
                            <td/>
                            <td colspan="3"><italic>Rootstock VVA 1</italic></td>
                            <td/>
                        </tr>
                        <tr align="center">
                            <td><bold>Control</bold></td>
                            <td>245</td>
                            <td>237</td>
                            <td>288</td>
                            <td>307</td>
                        </tr>
                        <tr align="center">
                            <td><bold>OMF+ foliar application</bold></td>
                            <td>334</td>
                            <td>354</td>
                            <td>345</td>
                            <td>352</td>
                        </tr>
                        <tr align="center">
                            <td><bold>LSD (<italic>p </italic>&#x2264;0.05)</bold></td>
                            <td>21.42</td>
                            <td>20.48</td>
                            <td>21.87</td>
                            <td>11.78</td>
                        </tr>
                        <tr align="center">
                            <td/>
                            <td colspan="3"><italic>Rootstock Best</italic></td>
                            <td/>
                        </tr>
                        <tr align="center">
                            <td><bold>Control</bold></td>
                            <td>210</td>
                            <td>259</td>
                            <td>295</td>
                            <td>286</td>
                        </tr>
                        <tr align="center">
                            <td><bold>OMF+ foliar application</bold></td>
                            <td>240</td>
                            <td>267</td>
                            <td>338</td>
                            <td>321</td>
                        </tr>
                        <tr align="center">
                            <td><bold>LSD (<italic>p </italic>&#x2264;0.05)</bold></td>
                            <td>8.22</td>
                            <td>5.44</td>
                            <td>16.98</td>
                            <td>7.52</td>
                        </tr>
                        <tr align="center">
                            <td/>
                            <td colspan="3"><italic>Rootstock PK SK 1</italic></td>
                            <td/>
                        </tr>
                        <tr align="center">
                            <td><bold>Control</bold></td>
                            <td>173</td>
                            <td>212</td>
                            <td>225</td>
                            <td>200</td>
                        </tr>
                        <tr align="center">
                            <td><bold>OMF+ foliar application</bold></td>
                            <td>197</td>
                            <td>255</td>
                            <td>241</td>
                            <td>236</td>
                        </tr>
                        <tr align="center">
                            <td><bold>LSD (<italic>p </italic>&#x2264;0.05)</bold></td>
                            <td>22.41</td>
                            <td>42.47</td>
                            <td>13.39</td>
                            <td>27.28</td>
                        </tr>
                        <tr align="center">
                            <td/>
                            <td colspan="3"><italic>Rootstock Pixy</italic></td>
                            <td/>
                        </tr>
                        <tr align="center">
                            <td><bold>Control</bold></td>
                            <td>192</td>
                            <td>229</td>
                            <td>237</td>
                            <td>256</td>
                        </tr>
                        <tr align="center">
                            <td><bold>OMF+ foliar application</bold></td>
                            <td>231</td>
                            <td>261</td>
                            <td>258</td>
                            <td>278</td>
                        </tr>
                        <tr align="center">
                            <td><bold>LSD (<italic>p </italic>&#x2264;0.05)</bold></td>
                            <td>25.01</td>
                            <td>20.68</td>
                            <td>24.08</td>
                            <td>25.76</td>
                        </tr>
                        <tr align="center">
                            <td/>
                            <td colspan="3"><italic>Rootstock cherry plum seedlings</italic></td>
                            <td/>
                        </tr>
                        <tr align="center">
                            <td><bold>Control</bold></td>
                            <td>257</td>
                            <td>248</td>
                            <td>261</td>
                            <td>254</td>
                        </tr>
                        <tr align="center">
                            <td><bold>OMF+ foliar application</bold></td>
                            <td>266</td>
                            <td>274</td>
                            <td>279</td>
                            <td>283</td>
                        </tr>
                        <tr align="center">
                            <td><bold>LSD (<italic>p </italic>&#x2264;0.05)</bold></td>
                            <td>22.81</td>
                            <td>12.04</td>
                            <td>15.63</td>
                            <td>7.28</td>
                        </tr>
                    </tbody>
                </table>
            </table-wrap>
            <p>The applied fertilizer system promoted significant excess of reproductive function of plants. Meanwhile, the slopes of trees on the rootstock <italic>VVA 1</italic> caused by harvest load were observed. That indicated the need for installation of supports by using the rootstock <italic>VVA 1</italic>. At the same time, that crown design and the dimensions of the trees allowed us to decrease significantly the plant nutrition area without a decline of the light regime that is also pointed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b46">Upadysheva, 2015</xref> in her research. The productivity of plum on the medium rootstocks was less significant, but the advantage of the version with the application of fertilizers was saved. The most significant and stable indicators of growth of productivity were received in the versions on the rootstock <italic>Best</italic> (<italic>LSD</italic> (<italic>p</italic> &#x2264;0.05) – 8.22 (2014); 5.44 (2015); 16.98 (2016); 7.52 (2017)) against the background of the application of fertilizers in those soil and climate conditions. At the same time, it is necessary to note that the values of indicators in the limits of the version were changeable significantly in trees on the rootstock PK SK 1, rootstock <italic>Pixi</italic> and rootstock <italic>cherry plum seedlings</italic>.</p>
            <p>The classification of plum fruits by quality was conducted according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b16">GOST standard 21920-76</xref> in all versions of the experiment. Such indicators as the color of the fruit, the appearance, the presence of the damages on the surface, the turgescence, and the homogeneity were identified on the level of standard that is common for the feature of plum of European varieties (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b18">Ionica et al, 2013</xref>). The significant differences in the dry matter content in fruits on the rootstocks of various strength of growth were not determined that was accorded with the data of the next scientists (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b28">Meland and Froynes, 2006</xref>). The sort (calibration) of fruits allowed us to identify the advantages of the version with the application of fertilizers by the criterion &#x201C;the weight of fruit&#x201D;. The optimization of the nutrition mode of plum of Stanley variety promoted a significant increase in the fruit weight no depending on the strength of growth of the rootstock. That fact matched the data of literature sources (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b20">Kaufmane et al, 2007</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b47">Vetrovа and Roeva, 2019</xref>) (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T5">5</xref>).</p>
            <table-wrap id="T5" position="float">
                <label>Table 5</label>
                <caption>
                    <p>The weight of plum fruit of Stanley variety depending on the application of fertilizers.</p>
                </caption>
                <table frame="hsides" rules="none" width="100%">
                    <thead>
                        <tr>
                            <th colspan="5">The mass of one fruit (g).</th>
                        </tr>
                        <tr>
                            <th colspan="5">
                                <hr/>
                            </th>
                        </tr>
                        <tr>
                            <th>Variation</th>
                            <th>2014</th>
                            <th>2015</th>
                            <th>2016</th>
                            <th>2017</th>
                        </tr>
                        <tr>
                            <th colspan="5">
                                <hr/>
                            </th>
                        </tr>
                    </thead>
                    <tbody>
                        <tr align="center">
                            <td/>
                            <td colspan="3"><italic>Rootstock VVA 1</italic></td>
                            <td/>
                        </tr>
                        <tr align="center">
                            <td><bold>Control</bold></td>
                            <td>41.7</td>
                            <td>40.9</td>
                            <td>34.8</td>
                            <td>38.8</td>
                        </tr>
                        <tr align="center">
                            <td><bold>OMF+ foliar application</bold></td>
                            <td>42.5</td>
                            <td>42.7</td>
                            <td>36.7</td>
                            <td>40.6</td>
                        </tr>
                        <tr align="center">
                            <td><bold>LSD (<italic>p </italic>&#x2264;0.05)</bold></td>
                            <td>0.59</td>
                            <td>1.05</td>
                            <td>1.34</td>
                            <td>0.97</td>
                        </tr>
                        <tr align="center">
                            <td/>
                            <td colspan="3"><italic>Rootstock Best</italic></td>
                            <td/>
                        </tr>
                        <tr align="center">
                            <td><bold>Control</bold></td>
                            <td>40.3</td>
                            <td>41.1</td>
                            <td>32.6</td>
                            <td>35.7</td>
                        </tr>
                        <tr align="center">
                            <td><bold>OMF+ foliar application</bold></td>
                            <td>40.8</td>
                            <td>41.9</td>
                            <td>33.6</td>
                            <td>37.8</td>
                        </tr>
                        <tr align="center">
                            <td><bold>LSD (<italic>p </italic>&#x2264;0.05)</bold></td>
                            <td>0.56</td>
                            <td>0.71</td>
                            <td>1.02</td>
                            <td>1.35</td>
                        </tr>
                        <tr align="center">
                            <td/>
                            <td colspan="3"><italic>Rootstock PK SK 1</italic></td>
                            <td/>
                        </tr>
                        <tr align="center">
                            <td><bold>Control</bold></td>
                            <td>39.2</td>
                            <td>40.1</td>
                            <td>37.5</td>
                            <td>40.1</td>
                        </tr>
                        <tr align="center">
                            <td><bold>OMF+ foliar application</bold></td>
                            <td>40.6</td>
                            <td>41.8</td>
                            <td>37.9</td>
                            <td>40.7</td>
                        </tr>
                        <tr align="center">
                            <td><bold>LSD (<italic>p </italic>&#x2264;0.05)</bold></td>
                            <td>1.04</td>
                            <td>0.43</td>
                            <td>1.42</td>
                            <td>0.78</td>
                        </tr>
                        <tr align="center">
                            <td/>
                            <td colspan="3"><italic>Rootstock Pixy</italic></td>
                            <td/>
                        </tr>
                        <tr align="center">
                            <td><bold>Control</bold></td>
                            <td>38.8</td>
                            <td>37.2</td>
                            <td>35.5</td>
                            <td>38.9</td>
                        </tr>
                        <tr align="center">
                            <td><bold>OMF+ foliar application</bold></td>
                            <td>39.4</td>
                            <td>40.5</td>
                            <td>36.7</td>
                            <td>39.6</td>
                        </tr>
                        <tr align="center">
                            <td><bold>LSD (<italic>p </italic>&#x2264;0.05)</bold></td>
                            <td>0.63</td>
                            <td>0.77</td>
                            <td>0.68</td>
                            <td>0.80</td>
                        </tr>
                        <tr align="center">
                            <td/>
                            <td colspan="3"><italic>Rootstock cherry plum seedlings</italic></td>
                            <td/>
                        </tr>
                        <tr align="center">
                            <td><bold>Control</bold></td>
                            <td>37.9</td>
                            <td>39.6</td>
                            <td>33.2</td>
                            <td>38.1</td>
                        </tr>
                        <tr align="center">
                            <td><bold>OMF+ foliar application</bold></td>
                            <td>38.6</td>
                            <td>40.3</td>
                            <td>33.3</td>
                            <td>38.7</td>
                        </tr>
                        <tr align="center">
                            <td><bold>LSD (<italic>p </italic>&#x2264;0.05)</bold></td>
                            <td>0.37</td>
                            <td>0.56</td>
                            <td>0.38</td>
                            <td>0.77</td>
                        </tr>
                    </tbody>
                </table>
            </table-wrap>
        </sec>
        <sec sec-type="conclusion">
            <title>CONCLUSION</title>
            <p>The impact of the rootstock and the systematic application of intra-soil and leaf dressings in combination with the phytoregulator on the physiological resistance of plum plants of Stanley variety to the negative effect of annually repeated abiotic factors in summer was investigated according to the criterion of functional state, productivity, and quality of fruits.</p>
            <p>As a result of the analysis of experimental data, we identified that the application of fertilizers promoted a significant increase of total content of biologically essential elements and enhanced the synthesis of functional pigments (Сhla+Сhlb) in spring during the period of the intensive shoot and ovary growth in the plum tree on rootstocks of various strength of growth. The total chlorophyll content (Сhla+Сhlb) in the leaves exceeded stably the value in the control version by 20.1 – 25.4% in trees on the rootstock <italic>PK SK 1</italic>, rootstock <italic>Pixy</italic>, rootstock <italic>cherry plum seedlings</italic>. The effectiveness of the influence of the nutrition mode revealed mostly in the years with the sufficient water availability on the dwarf rootstock <italic>VVA 1</italic> that has the surface occurrence of the main part of the root system. The increase of the growth process activity was confirmed by the increase of the content of free amino acids that were the most active participants in metabolism in the leaves.</p>
            <p>The conditions of mineral nutrition mode influenced the chlorophyll synthesis in plum leaves on the rootstock <italic>VVA 1</italic>, rootstock <italic>Best</italic>, rootstock <italic>PK SK 1</italic> and rootstock <italic>cherry plum seedlings</italic> in summer against the background of hyperthermia, the lack of precipitation, and the decrease of air humidity up to 12 – 14%. The specific to these conditions decline of protein content in the trees on the rootstock <italic>Best</italic> and rootstock <italic>PK SK 1</italic> was minimal. That fact characterized higher intensity of reparation processes. Plants on the rootstock <italic>cherry plum seedlings</italic> had the most significant losses of shared water that were up to 9.3% (Organic Mineral Fertilizer + non-root dressings) and 12.7% (control, with no fertilizers). The minimal water losses were identified in leaves in plum on the rootstock <italic>PK SK 1</italic> that was 5.7 – 8.4% respectively.</p>
            <p>The periodical precipitation in early September promoted growth activity mainly in trees on the medium rootstocks. The period of growth activity was accompanied by the increase of gross content of nitrogen, phosphorous, and magnesium that was up to 18.6%, 7.7, and 29.5% respectively. The most significant increase of amino acid content in leaves was determined in plum plants on the rootstock <italic>Best</italic> against the background of the application of fertilizers. The excess of the sum of amino acids was 26.6 – 30.8% in some years.</p>
            <p>The period of the beginning of fruit ripening was characterized by the accumulation of gross forms of potassium and calcium in them. The potassium and calcium content in fruits in the version with the application of fertilizers exceeded the amount of the elements in fruits of control version by 12.5 and 23.5%; 24.2 and 11.5%; 17.3 and 19.6% on the rootstock <italic>VVA 1</italic>, rootstock <italic>Best</italic>, rootstock <italic>PK SK 1</italic> respectively. At the same time, the harvest accountings revealed the advantage of the versions with the application of fertilizers: there was an increase in productivity due to a decline of ovary reduction in spring and summer. The number of the fully preserved ovary was higher by 12.3-33.7% depending on the rootstock.</p>
            <p>The commercial quality analysis by the criterion &#x201C;the weight of fruit&#x201D; that identified the level of economic feasibility of the adoption of optimization of culture&#x2019;s mineral nutrition mode showed the advantages of the version with the application of fertilizers. The largest fruits were obtained from the trees on the rootstock <italic>VVA 1</italic> and rootstock <italic>Best</italic>.</p>
        </sec>
    </body>
    <back>
        <ref-list>
            <ref id="b1">
                <element-citation publication-type="book">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">
                        <name>
                            <surname>Blazhny</surname>
                            <given-names>E.S.</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name>
                            <surname>Gavrilyuk</surname>
                            <given-names>F.Ya.</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name>
                            <surname>Valkov</surname>
                            <given-names>V.F.</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name>
                            <surname>Redkin</surname>
                            <given-names>N.E.</given-names>
                        </name>
                    </person-group>
                    <source>
                        <italic>Chernozems of the Western Ciscaucasia. Chernozems of the USSR.</italic>
                    </source>
                    <publisher-loc>Moscow, Russia</publisher-loc>
                    <publisher-name>Ciscaucasia and Caucasus</publisher-name>
                    <year>1985</year>
                    <fpage>5</fpage>
                    <lpage>59</lpage>
                </element-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="b2">
                <element-citation publication-type="thesis">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">
                        <name>
                            <surname>Bogdanov</surname>
                            <given-names>P.E.</given-names>
                        </name>
                    </person-group>
                    <source>
                        <italic>Biological features and economic value of plum varieties and forms for production and selection:</italic> abstract of the PhD thesis. Michurinsk, Russia 23 p.</source>
                       <year>2003</year> 
                </element-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="b3">
                <element-citation publication-type="journal">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">
                        <name>
                            <surname>Cuque</surname>
                            <given-names>F.</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name>
                            <surname>Motta A.Tutida</surname>
                            <given-names>I.</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name>
                            <surname>May-De Mio</surname>
                            <given-names>L.</given-names>
                        </name>
                    </person-group>
                    <year>2011</year>
                    <article-title>Nitrogen and potassium fertilization affecting the plum postharvest quality.</article-title>
                    <source>
                        <italic>Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura</italic>
                    </source>
                    <volume>3</volume>
                    <issue>3</issue>
                    <fpage>328</fpage>
                    <lpage>336</lpage>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1590/S0100-29452011000500041</pub-id>
                </element-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="b4">
                <element-citation publication-type="book">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">
                        <name>
                            <surname>Doroshenko</surname>
                            <given-names>T.N.</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name>
                            <surname>Zakharchuk</surname>
                            <given-names>N.V.</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name>
                            <surname>Ryazanova</surname>
                            <given-names>L.G.</given-names>
                        </name>
                    </person-group>
                    <source>
                        <italic>Adaptive potential of fruit plants in the south of Russia.</italic>
                    </source>
                    <publisher-loc>Krasnodar, Russia</publisher-loc>
                    <publisher-name>Enlightenment-Yug</publisher-name>
                    <year>2010</year>
                    <fpage>123</fpage>
                </element-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="b5">
                <element-citation publication-type="journal">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">
                        <name>
                            <surname>Doroshenko</surname>
                            <given-names>T. N.</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name>
                            <surname>Ryazanova</surname>
                            <given-names>L. G.</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name>
                            <surname>Maksimtsov</surname>
                            <given-names>D. V.</given-names>
                        </name>
                    </person-group>
                    <year>2015</year>
                    <article-title>Role of boron in optimization plum on the South of Russia.</article-title>
                    <source>
                        <italic>Fruit and berry growing in Russia</italic>
                    </source>
                    <volume>42</volume>
                    <fpage>272</fpage>
                    <lpage>276</lpage>
                </element-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="b6">
                <element-citation publication-type="book">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">
                        <name>
                            <surname>Eisert</surname>
                            <given-names>E.K.</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name>
                            <surname>Achkanov</surname>
                            <given-names>A.Ya.</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name>
                            <surname>Durgaryan</surname>
                            <given-names>N.G.</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <etal/>
                    </person-group>
                    <source>
                        <italic>Handbook of agricultural chemist of the Kuban.</italic>
                    </source>
                    <publisher-loc>Krasnodar, Russia</publisher-loc>
                    <year>1987</year>
                    <fpage>256</fpage>
                </element-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="b7">
                <element-citation publication-type="book">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">
                        <name>
                            <surname>Eremin</surname>
                            <given-names>G.V.</given-names>
                        </name>
                    </person-group>
                    <source>
                        <italic>Biological potential of stone fruit crops and ways to implement it Biological potential of garden plants and ways to implement it.</italic>
                    </source>
                    <publisher-loc>Moscow, Russia</publisher-loc>
                    <year>2000</year>
                    <fpage>108</fpage>
                    <lpage>115</lpage>
                </element-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="b8">
                <element-citation publication-type="book">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">
                        <name>
                            <surname>Eremin</surname>
                            <given-names>G.V.</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name>
                            <surname>Provorchenko</surname>
                            <given-names>A.V.</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name>
                            <surname>Gavrish</surname>
                            <given-names>V.F.</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name>
                            <surname>Podorozhnyi</surname>
                            <given-names>V.N.</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name>
                            <surname>Eremin</surname>
                            <given-names>V.G.</given-names>
                        </name>
                    </person-group>
                    <source>
                        <italic>Stone fruit crops. Cultivation on clonal rootstocks and own roots.</italic>
                    </source>
                    <publisher-loc>Rostov-on-Don</publisher-loc>
                    <publisher-name>Feniks</publisher-name>
                    <year>2000</year>
                    <fpage>256</fpage>
                    <comment>(in Russian)</comment>
                </element-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="b9">
                <element-citation publication-type="book">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">
                        <name>
                            <surname>Eremin</surname>
                            <given-names>G.V.</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name>
                            <surname>Prichko</surname>
                            <given-names>T.G.</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name>
                            <surname>Kekhaev</surname>
                            <given-names>V.K.</given-names>
                        </name>
                    </person-group>
                    <source>
                        <italic>The growing technology of fruits plums for making prunes.</italic>
                    </source>
                    <publisher-loc>Krasnodar</publisher-loc>
                    <publisher-name>Depart. Sel. Khoz-va</publisher-name>
                    <year>2006</year>
                    <fpage>29</fpage>
                    <comment>(in Russian)</comment>
                </element-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="b10">
                <element-citation publication-type="journal">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">
                        <name>
                            <surname>Eremin</surname>
                            <given-names>G.</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name>
                            <surname>Brizhinov</surname>
                            <given-names>A.</given-names>
                        </name>
                    </person-group>
                    <year>2011</year>
                    <article-title>Evaluation of varieties andcljnal rootstocks for creation of early appearance of fruit orchards of prunus domestica.</article-title>
                    <source>
                        <italic>Fruit growing and viticulture of South Russia</italic>
                    </source>
                    <volume>11</volume>
                    <issue>5</issue>
                    <fpage>14</fpage>
                    <lpage>21</lpage>
                </element-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="b11">
                <element-citation publication-type="journal">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">
                        <name>
                            <surname>Fatma, Abou Grah, I. I., Essam Osman, Shiref, A.E.A.</surname>
                        </name>
                    </person-group>
                    <year>2018</year>
                    <article-title>Effect of different NPK fertilizer levels on growth, fruiting parameters and fruit quality of some plum cultivars.</article-title>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.13140/RG.2.2.29654.14401</pub-id>
                </element-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="b12">
                <element-citation publication-type="journal">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">
                        <name>
                            <surname>Gnezdilova</surname>
                            <given-names>E.M.</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name>
                            <surname>Doroshenko</surname>
                            <given-names>A.F.</given-names>
                        </name>
                    </person-group>
                    <article-title>Assessment of drought resistance of plum and cherry varieties. SB. scientific</article-title>
                    <source>
                        <italic>Tr. Stavropol research Institute of agriculture. Stavropol</italic>
                    </source>
                    <year>1984</year>
                    <fpage>16</fpage>
                    <lpage>20</lpage>
                </element-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="b13">
                <element-citation publication-type="other">
                    <source>
                        <italic>GOST standard 26204-91. Soils. Determination of mobile compounds of phosphorus and potassium by Chiricov method modified by CINAO</italic>. 1992– 5 p.</source>
                </element-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="b14">
                <element-citation publication-type="other">
                    <source>
                        <italic>GOST standard 26213-91. Soils. Methods for determination of organic matter.</italic>1992 – 6 p.</source>
                </element-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="b15">
                <element-citation publication-type="other">
                    <source>
                        <italic>GOST standard 26951-86. Soils. Determination of nitrates by ionometric method. </italic>1986. – 7 p. </source>
                </element-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="b16">
                <element-citation publication-type="other">
                    <source>
                        <italic>GOST standard 21920-76. Fresh large-sized plums and alycha Specifications.</italic> 2010. – 10 p. </source>
                </element-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="b17">
                <element-citation publication-type="journal">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">
                        <name>
                            <surname>Li</surname>
                            <given-names>W.</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name>
                            <surname>Wu</surname>
                            <given-names>W.</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name>
                            <surname>Zhang</surname>
                            <given-names>Z.</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name>
                            <surname>Lu</surname>
                            <given-names>Z.</given-names>
                        </name>
                    </person-group>
                    <article-title>Influence of soil moisture on hydraulic and growth characteristics of Prunus armeniaca X sibirica. <italic>Xibei nonglin keji daxue xuebao. Ziran kexue ban. J. Northwest Sci-Tech Univ. Agr. And Forest.</italic></article-title>
                    <source>
                        <italic>Nat. Sci. Educ.</italic>
                    </source>
                    <year>2003</year>
                    <volume>31</volume>
                    <issue>4</issue>
                    <fpage>139</fpage>
                    <lpage>144</lpage>
                </element-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="b18">
                <element-citation publication-type="journal">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">
                        <name>
                            <surname>Ionica</surname>
                            <given-names>M.E.</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name>
                            <surname>Nour</surname>
                            <given-names>V.</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name>
                            <surname>Trandafir</surname>
                            <given-names>I.</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name>
                            <surname>Cosmulescu</surname>
                            <given-names>S.</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name>
                            <surname>Botu</surname>
                            <given-names>M.</given-names>
                        </name>
                    </person-group>
                    <article-title>Physical and chemical properties of some European plam cultivars (<italic>Prunus domestica</italic> L.).</article-title>
                    <source>
                        <italic>Not. Bot. Horti Agrobot. Cluj-Napoca</italic>
                    </source>
                    <year>2013</year>
                    <volume>41</volume>
                    <issue>2</issue>
                    <fpage>499</fpage>
                    <lpage>503</lpage>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15835/nbha4129354</pub-id>
                </element-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="b19">
                <element-citation publication-type="book">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">
                        <name>
                            <surname>IUSS Working Group WRB</surname>
                        </name>
                    </person-group>
                    <year>2014</year>
                    <source>
                        <italic>World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014. International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps.</italic> World Soil Resources Reports No. 106. FAO. Rome. 181 р. ISBN 978-92-5-108369-7</source>
                    <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://www.fao.org/3/i3794en/I3794en.pdf">http://www.fao.org/3/i3794en/I3794en.pdf</ext-link>
                </element-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="b20">
                <element-citation publication-type="journal">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">
                        <name>
                            <surname>Kaufmane</surname>
                            <given-names>E.</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name>
                            <surname>Scrivele</surname>
                            <given-names>M.</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name>
                            <surname>Rubauskis</surname>
                            <given-names>E.</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name>
                            <surname>Ikase</surname>
                            <given-names>L.</given-names>
                        </name>
                    </person-group>
                    <article-title>The yield and fruit quality of two plum cultivars on different rootstocks.</article-title>
                    <source>
                        <italic>Sodinink. Darzinink.</italic>
                    </source>
                    <year>2007</year>
                    <volume>26</volume>
                    <issue>3</issue>
                    <fpage>10</fpage>
                    <lpage>15</lpage>
                    <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://www.lsdi.lt/straipsniai/26(3).pdf">http://www.lsdi.lt/straipsniai/26(3).pdf</ext-link>
                </element-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="b21">
                <element-citation publication-type="book">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">
                        <name>
                            <surname>Kushnirenko</surname>
                            <given-names>M.D.</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name>
                            <surname>Kurchatova</surname>
                            <given-names>G.P.</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name>
                            <surname>Stepinca</surname>
                            <given-names>A.A.</given-names>
                        </name>
                    </person-group>
                    <year>1986</year>
                    <source>
                        <italic>Rapid methods of diagnosis of heat-, drought- and the timing of watering the plants.</italic> Kishinev: Stiinta. 39 p.</source>
                </element-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="b22">
                <element-citation publication-type="journal">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">
                        <name>
                            <surname>Kuznetsova</surname>
                            <given-names>A. P.</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name>
                            <surname>Nenko</surname>
                            <given-names>N. I.</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name>
                            <surname>Drabudko</surname>
                            <given-names>N. N.</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name>
                            <surname>Shcheglov</surname>
                            <given-names>S. N.</given-names>
                        </name>
                    </person-group>
                    <year>2011</year>
                    <article-title>USE of biologically active substances in production of the qualiatative material of stone rootstocks.</article-title>
                    <source>
                        <italic>Fruit growing and viticulture of South Russia</italic>
                    </source>
                    <volume>8</volume>
                    <issue>2</issue>
                    <fpage>35</fpage>
                    <lpage>46</lpage>
                </element-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="b23">
                <element-citation publication-type="journal">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">
                        <name>
                            <surname>Kuznetsova</surname>
                            <given-names>A. P.</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name>
                            <surname>Romanenko</surname>
                            <given-names>A. S.</given-names>
                        </name>
                    </person-group>
                    <year>2014</year>
                    <article-title>Actual directions and priority of stable development of nursery planting industry.</article-title>
                    <source>
                        <italic>Fruit growing and viticulture of South Russia</italic>
                    </source>
                    <volume>30</volume>
                    <issue>6</issue>
                    <fpage>90</fpage>
                    <lpage>97</lpage>
                </element-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="b24">
                <element-citation publication-type="journal">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">
                        <name>
                            <surname>Kuznetsova</surname>
                            <given-names>A. P.</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name>
                            <surname>Kovalenko</surname>
                            <given-names>S. P.</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name>
                            <surname>Sergeeva</surname>
                            <given-names>N. N.</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name>
                            <surname>Sergeev</surname>
                            <given-names>F. I.</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name>
                            <surname>Nenko</surname>
                            <given-names>N. I.</given-names>
                        </name>
                    </person-group>
                    <year>2016</year>
                    <article-title>Technology of cultivation of plums for the South of Russia.</article-title>
                    <source>
                        <italic>Fruit growing and viticulture of South Russia</italic>
                    </source>
                    <volume>42</volume>
                    <issue>6</issue>
                    <fpage>33</fpage>
                    <lpage>47</lpage>
                </element-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="b25">
                <element-citation publication-type="journal">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">
                        <name>
                            <surname>Kuznetsova</surname>
                            <given-names>A.P.</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name>
                            <surname>Shcheglov</surname>
                            <given-names>S.N.</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name>
                            <surname>Fedorenko</surname>
                            <given-names>A.M.</given-names>
                        </name>
                    </person-group>
                    <year>2018</year>
                    <article-title>Selection of adaptive forms of rootstocks for plum-tree</article-title>
                    <source>
                        <italic>Fruit growing and viticulture of South Russia</italic>
                    </source>
                    <volume>56</volume>
                    <issue>6</issue>
                    <fpage>10</fpage>
                    <lpage>21</lpage>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.30679/2219-5335-2018-6-54-10-21</pub-id>
                </element-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="b26">
                <element-citation publication-type="journal">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">
                        <name>
                            <surname>Lipchiu</surname>
                            <given-names>N. V.</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name>
                            <surname>Gagai</surname>
                            <given-names>I. V.</given-names>
                        </name>
                    </person-group>
                    <year>2014</year>
                    <article-title>Current state of the Krasnodar territory lands.</article-title>
                    <source>
                        <italic>Polythematic online scientific journal of Kuban State Agrarian University</italic>
                    </source>
                    <volume>99</volume>
                    <fpage>1138</fpage>
                    <lpage>1153</lpage>
                </element-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="b27">
                <element-citation publication-type="journal">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">
                        <name>
                            <surname>Manganaris</surname>
                            <given-names>G.A.</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name>
                            <surname>Vicente</surname>
                            <given-names>A.R.</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name>
                            <surname>Crisosto</surname>
                            <given-names>C.H.</given-names>
                        </name>
                    </person-group>
                    <article-title>Effect of pre-harvest and post-harvest conditions and treatments on plum fruit quality.</article-title>
                    <source>
                        <italic>Perspect. Agric. Vet. Sci. Nutr. Nat. Resour.</italic>
                    </source>
                    <year>2008</year>
                    <volume>3</volume>
                    <issue>9</issue>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1079/PAVSNNR20083009</pub-id>
                </element-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="b28">
                <element-citation publication-type="journal">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">
                        <name>
                            <surname>Meland</surname>
                            <given-names>M.</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name>
                            <surname>Froynes</surname>
                            <given-names>O.</given-names>
                        </name>
                    </person-group>
                    <article-title>Performance of five plum rootstocks to the plum cultivars &#x2018;Opal&#x2019; and &#x2018;Reine Claude GF 1119&#x2019; (growing in Norway).</article-title>
                    <source>
                        <italic>Sodinink. Darzinink.</italic>
                    </source>
                    <year>2006</year>
                    <volume>25</volume>
                    <issue>4</issue>
                    <fpage>179</fpage>
                    <lpage>186</lpage>
                </element-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="b29">
                <element-citation publication-type="journal">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">
                        <name>
                            <surname>Mileti&#x0107;</surname>
                            <given-names>R.</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name>
                            <surname>Miti&#x0107;</surname>
                            <given-names>N.</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name>
                            <surname>Nikoli&#x0107;</surname>
                            <given-names>R.</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name>
                            <surname>&#x017D;iki&#x0107;</surname>
                            <given-names>M.</given-names>
                        </name>
                    </person-group>
                    <article-title>Uticaj odr&#x017E;avanja zemlji&#x0161;ta na vodni re&#x017E;im I sadr&#x017E;aj makroelemenata u li&#x0161;&#x0107;u &#x0161;ljive.</article-title>
                    <source>
                        <italic>Jugusloven. Voćar.</italic>
                    </source>
                    <year>2003</year>
                    <volume>37</volume>
                    <issue>3-4</issue>
                    <fpage>153</fpage>
                    <lpage>161</lpage>
                </element-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="b30">
                <element-citation publication-type="journal">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">
                        <name>
                            <surname>Mileti&#x0107;</surname>
                            <given-names>R.</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name>
                            <surname>Nikoli&#x0107;</surname>
                            <given-names>R.</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name>
                            <surname>Miti&#x0107;</surname>
                            <given-names>N.</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name>
                            <surname>Raki&#x0107;evi&#x0107;</surname>
                            <given-names>M.</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name>
                            <surname>Blagojevi&#x0107;</surname>
                            <given-names>M.</given-names>
                        </name>
                    </person-group>
                    <article-title>Rodnost sorti &#x0161;ljve &#x010C;a&#x010D;anska Lepotica I Steney u gustoj sadnji.</article-title>
                    <source>
                        <italic>Voćarstvo</italic>
                    </source>
                    <year>2007</year>
                    <volume>41</volume>
                    <issue>159</issue>
                    <fpage>113</fpage>
                    <lpage>119</lpage>
                </element-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="b31">
                <element-citation publication-type="journal">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">
                        <name>
                            <surname>Milo&#x0161;evi&#x0107;</surname>
                            <given-names>T.</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name>
                            <surname>Milo&#x0161;evi&#x0107;</surname>
                            <given-names>N.</given-names>
                        </name>
                    </person-group>
                    <article-title>Factors influencing mineral composition of plum fruits.</article-title>
                    <source>
                        <italic>J. Elem.</italic>
                    </source>
                    <year>2012</year>
                    <volume>17</volume>
                    <issue>3</issue>
                    <fpage>453</fpage>
                    <lpage>464</lpage>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5601/jelem.2012.17.3.08</pub-id>
                </element-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="b32">
                <element-citation publication-type="book">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">
                        <name>
                            <surname>Negovelov</surname>
                            <given-names>S.F.</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name>
                            <surname>Valkov</surname>
                            <given-names>V.F.</given-names>
                        </name>
                    </person-group>
                    <source>
                        <italic>Soils and gardens.</italic>
                    </source>
                    <publisher-loc>Rostov, Russia</publisher-loc>
                    <year>1985</year>
                    <fpage>192</fpage>
                </element-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="b33">
                <element-citation publication-type="book">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">
                        <name>
                            <surname>Nenko</surname>
                            <given-names>N.</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <etal/>
                    </person-group>
                    <year>2015</year>
                    <source>
                        <italic>Modern instrumental and analytical methods of research of fruit crops and grapes</italic>: Krasnodar: KZNIISiV, 115 p. ISBN: 978-5-98272-107-5</source>
                </element-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="b34">
                <element-citation publication-type="journal">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">
                        <name>
                            <surname>Plich</surname>
                            <given-names>H.</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name>
                            <surname>W&#x00F3;jcik</surname>
                            <given-names>P.</given-names>
                        </name>
                    </person-group>
                    <article-title>The effect of calcium and boron foliar application on postharvest plum fruit quality.</article-title>
                    <source>
                        <italic>Acta Hortic.</italic>
                    </source>
                    <year>2002</year>
                    <issue>594</issue>
                    <fpage>445</fpage>
                    <lpage>451</lpage>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17660/ActaHortic.2002.594.57</pub-id>
                </element-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="b35">
                <element-citation publication-type="journal">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">
                        <name>
                            <surname>Popova</surname>
                            <given-names>V.P.</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name>
                            <surname>Yaroshenko</surname>
                            <given-names>O.V.</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name>
                            <surname>Sergeeva</surname>
                            <given-names>N.N.</given-names>
                        </name>
                    </person-group>
                    <article-title>The effect of foliar feeding on physiological condition of apple trees and chemical content of fruits.</article-title>
                    <source>
                        <italic>Potravinarstvo Slovak Journal of Food Sciences</italic>
                    </source>
                    <year>2018</year>
                    <volume>12</volume>
                    <issue>1</issue>
                    <fpage>634</fpage>
                    <lpage>643</lpage>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5219/928</pub-id>
                </element-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="b36">
                <element-citation publication-type="book">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">
                        <name>
                            <surname>Provorchenko</surname>
                            <given-names>A.V.</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name>
                            <surname>Gavrish</surname>
                            <given-names>V.F.</given-names>
                        </name>
                    </person-group>
                    <source>
                        <italic>Constructions of home plum plantings on clonal rootstocks of different growth strength. Storage and use of genetic resources of garden and vegetable crops.</italic>
                    </source>
                    <publisher-loc>Russia</publisher-loc>
                    <publisher-name>Krymsk</publisher-name>
                    <year>2015</year>
                    <fpage>53</fpage>
                    <lpage>55</lpage>
                </element-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="b37">
                <element-citation publication-type="journal">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">
                        <name>
                            <surname>Raki&#x0107;evi&#x0107;</surname>
                            <given-names>M.</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name>
                            <surname>Blagojevi&#x0107;</surname>
                            <given-names>M.</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name>
                            <surname>Mitrovi&#x0107;</surname>
                            <given-names>M.</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name>
                            <surname>Mileti&#x0107;</surname>
                            <given-names>R.</given-names>
                        </name>
                    </person-group>
                    <article-title>Rodnost sorti &#x0161;ljve &#x010C;a&#x010D;anska Lepotica I Steney u gustoj sadnji.</article-title>
                    <source>
                        <italic>Vocarstvo</italic>
                    </source>
                    <year>2007</year>
                    <volume>41</volume>
                    <issue>159</issue>
                    <fpage>107</fpage>
                    <lpage>111</lpage>
                </element-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="b38">
                <element-citation publication-type="book">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">
                        <name>
                            <surname>Safarov</surname>
                            <given-names>R.M.</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name>
                            <surname>Andryushchenko</surname>
                            <given-names>Yu.N.</given-names>
                        </name>
                    </person-group>
                    <source>
                Growing Russian plum varieties Globus on various clonal rootstocks. <italic>Storage and use of genetic resources of garden and vegetable crops.</italic>
            </source>
                    <publisher-loc>Russia</publisher-loc>
                    <publisher-name>Krymsk</publisher-name>
                    <year>2015</year>
                    <fpage>60</fpage>
                    <lpage>62</lpage>
                </element-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="b39">
                <element-citation publication-type="book">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">
                        <name>
                            <surname>Sedov</surname>
                            <given-names>E.N.</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name>
                            <surname>Ogoltsova</surname>
                            <given-names>T.P.</given-names>
                        </name>
                    </person-group>
                    <source>
                        <italic>Program and method of variety study of fruit, berry and nut crops.</italic>
                    </source>
                    <publisher-loc>Orel, Russia</publisher-loc>
                    <publisher-name>VNIISPK</publisher-name>
                    <year>1999</year>
                    <fpage>608</fpage>
                </element-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="b40">
                <element-citation publication-type="confproc">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">
                        <name>
                            <surname>Semenova</surname>
                            <given-names>L.G.</given-names>
                        </name>
                    </person-group>
                    <year>2007</year>
                    <article-title>Violation in fruit development and anatomical structure of the stalk of plum and cherry plum.</article-title>
                    <source>
                        <italic>Proceedings of the Kuban state agrarian University</italic>
                    </source>
                    <volume>1</volume>
                    <fpage>107</fpage>
                    <lpage>109</lpage>
                </element-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="b41">
                <element-citation publication-type="other">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">
                        <name>
                            <surname>Sergeeva</surname>
                            <given-names>N. N.</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name>
                            <surname>Kuznetsova</surname>
                            <given-names>A. P.</given-names>
                        </name>
                    </person-group>
                    <year>2014</year>
                    <source>Functional stability of plum plants depending on variety-rootstock combinations, crown formation system and fertilizer application. <italic>Scientific work. Modeling of processes for ensuring the sustainability of agroecosystems of fruit crops and grapes.</italic> Krasnodar, Russia, vol. 5, p. 113-119.</source>
                </element-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="b42">
                <element-citation publication-type="book">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">
                        <name>
                            <surname>Sergeeva</surname>
                            <given-names>N.N.</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name>
                            <surname>Yatsenko</surname>
                            <given-names>G.A.</given-names>
                        </name>
                    </person-group>
                    <year>1999</year>
                    <source>Optimization of mineral nutrition of plums. Modern problems of scientific support for the branches of "Horticulture and viticulture" on the threshold of the 21<sup>st</sup> century. Krasnodar, Russia, p. 47-50. </source>
                </element-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="b43">
                <element-citation publication-type="book">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">
                        <name>
                            <surname>Shishov</surname>
                            <given-names>L.L.</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name>
                            <surname>Tonkonogov</surname>
                            <given-names>V.D.</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name>
                            <surname>Lebedeva</surname>
                            <given-names>I.I.</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name>
                            <surname>Gerasimova</surname>
                            <given-names>M.I.</given-names>
                        </name>
                    </person-group>
                    <year>2004</year>
                    <source>
                        <italic>Classification and diagnostics of Russian soils.</italic> Smolensk, Russia: Ecumene, 342 p. ISBN: 5935200449  (in Russia). </source>
                </element-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="b44">
                <element-citation publication-type="book">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">
                        <name>
                            <surname>Simakin</surname>
                            <given-names>A.I.</given-names>
                        </name>
                    </person-group>
                    <source>
                        <italic>Kuban agrochemical characteristics of black soil and fertilizer.</italic>
                    </source>
                    <publisher-loc>Krasnodar, Russia</publisher-loc>
                    <year>1969</year>
                    <fpage>278</fpage>
                </element-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="b45">
                <element-citation publication-type="book">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">
                        <name>
                            <surname>Upadyshev</surname>
                            <given-names>G.Y.</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name>
                            <surname>Upadyshev</surname>
                            <given-names>M.T.</given-names>
                        </name>
                    </person-group>
                    <year>2014</year>
                    <source>Effectiveness of biological products at cultivation of plums. <italic>Prospects for the use of new forms of fertilizers, plant protection agents and growth regulators in agricultural technologies of agricultural crops</italic>. Moscow, Russia, p. 285-289. ISBN: 978-5-9238-0174-3 </source>
                </element-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="b46">
                <element-citation publication-type="book">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">
                        <name>
                            <surname>Upadysheva</surname>
                            <given-names>G.Yu.</given-names>
                        </name>
                    </person-group>
                    <year>2015</year>
                    <source>Features of growth and production process in plum (<italic>Prunus domestica</italic> L.) during the formation of small-sized crowns. <italic>Methods and technologies in plant breeding and crop production</italic>: Kirov, Russia, p. 487-490.</source>
                </element-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="b47">
                <element-citation publication-type="journal">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">
                        <name>
                            <surname>Vetrova</surname>
                            <given-names>O.A.</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name>
                            <surname>Roeva</surname>
                            <given-names>T.A.</given-names>
                        </name>
                    </person-group>
                    <year>2019</year>
                    <article-title>Some ways to diagnose the optimal time of harvesting apples for juice production.</article-title>
                    <source>
                        <italic>Contemporary horticulture</italic>
                    </source>
                    <volume>3</volume>
                    <fpage>48</fpage>
                    <lpage>69</lpage>
                    <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.24411/2312-6701-2019-10307</pub-id>
                </element-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="b48">
                <element-citation publication-type="book">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">
                        <name>
                            <surname>Voskresenskaya</surname>
                            <given-names>O.L.</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name>
                            <surname>Alyabysheva</surname>
                            <given-names>E.A.</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name>
                            <surname>Polovnikova</surname>
                            <given-names>M.G.</given-names>
                        </name>
                    </person-group>
                    <source>
                        <italic>A large workshop on bioecology.</italic>
                    </source>
                    <edition>1st ed</edition>
                    <publisher-loc>Yoshar-Ola, Russia</publisher-loc>
                    <publisher-name>Mari State University</publisher-name>
                    <year>2006</year>
                </element-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="b49">
                <element-citation publication-type="journal">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">
                        <name>
                            <surname>Wan</surname>
                            <given-names>Yi-zhen</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name>
                            <surname>Sheng</surname>
                            <given-names>Bo-biao</given-names>
                        </name>
                    </person-group>
                    <article-title>Effect of compound fertilizers on growth physiology an fruit quality of nectarines and grapes.</article-title>
                    <source>
                        <italic>Xibei zhiwu xuebao. Acta Bot. Boreali-Occident. Sin., </italic>
                    </source>
                    <year>2003</year>
                    <volume>23</volume>
                    <issue>1</issue>
                    <fpage>34</fpage>
                    <lpage>38</lpage>
                </element-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="b50">
                <element-citation publication-type="book">
                    <person-group person-group-type="author">
                        <name>
                            <surname>Yaroshenko</surname>
                            <given-names>O.V.</given-names>
                        </name>
                        <name>
                            <surname>Sergeeva</surname>
                            <given-names>N.N.</given-names>
                        </name>
                    </person-group>
                    <year>2020</year>
                    <source>
                        <italic>Methodological aspects of setting up a field experiment with fertilization in an orchard. </italic>Krasnodar, Russia: FSBSI “NCFSCHVW”, 34 p. ISBN 978-5-98272-137-2</source>
                </element-citation>
            </ref>
        </ref-list>
    </back>
</article>